Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30505061›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2018

Statistical correction for functional metagenomic profiling of a microbial community with short NGS reads.

Ruofei Du, Zhide Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruofei DuBiostatistics Shared Resource, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, USA.
Zhide FangBiostatistics Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, USA.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By sequence homology search, the list of all the functions found and the counts of reads being aligned to them present the functional profile of a metagenomic sample. However, a significant obstacle has been observed in this approach due to the short read length associated with many next generation sequencing technologies. This includes artificial families, cross-annotations, length bias and conservation bias. The widely applied cutoff methods, such as BLAST E-value, are not able to solve the problems. Following the published successful procedures on the artificial families and the cross-annotation issue, we propose in this paper to use zero-truncated Poisson and Binomial (ZTP-Bin) hierarchical modelling to correct the length bias and the conservation bias. Goodness-of-fit of the modelling and cross-validation for the prediction using a bioinformatic simulated sample show the validity of this approach. Evaluated on an in vitro-simulated data set, the proposed modelling method outperforms other traditional methods. All three steps were then sequentially applied on real-life metagenomic samples to show that the proposed framework will lead to a more accurate functional profile of a short read metagenomic sample.

Indexed as

conservation biasfunctional profilinglength biasmetagenomicsPrimary 62F10secondary 62P10short reads

Identifiers

PMID30505061
PMCPMC6261491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.