ArticleReumatologia2018
Tocilizumab in the treatment of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis - single-centre experience.
Article in Reumatologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233397 (Phase 2 Study of Systemic IL-6 Receptor Antagonist ACTEMRA®), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 2 Study of Systemic IL-6 Receptor Antagonist ACTEMRA® (Tocilizumab) for the Treatment of Progressive/Recurrent Pediatric Adamantinomatous Craniopharyngioma
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of therapies for Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS): a systematic review informing the EULAR/PReS guidelines for the management of Still's disease.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Early IL-1 Inhibition in Still's Disease: A Window of Opportunity for Improving Outcomes.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Article
- Rescue of Pap-Mas in Systemic JIA Using Janus Kinase Inhibitors, Case Report and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Chemotherapy vs. Immunotherapy in combating nCOVID19: An update.Human immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of tocilizumab treatment in children with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a single centre. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was based on a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 10 patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis who were treated with tocilizumab in the period September 2011-July 2017. Their medical records were analysed taking into consideration the effectiveness of tocilizumab treatment and frequency of side effects.
resultsBefore the initiation of treatment, 9/10 patients from the study group complained of fever and had significantly increased values of inflammatory markers, with the median CRP concentration 41.1 mg/l (norm < 5 mg/l) and ESR 37 mm/h (norm < 12 mg/l). The period of the initial 12 weeks of treatment was a quantum leap in the course of the disease: all children were afebrile, and inflammatory markers values decreased by 99.4% in the case of CRP and 91.9% in ESR. All patients fulfilled ACR Pedi 50 criteria, and 3 of them achieved ACR Pedi 70. In the next stages of treatment the response to tocilizumab was sustained, reaching 10 children achieving ACR Pedi 70 and 5 ACR Pedi 90 after one year of therapy. Tocilizumab appeared to be relatively safe in the study group. Although elevation of transaminases and neutropenia were observed in 5/10 patients, they were usually mild and transitional in their course.
conclusionsTocilizumab is both effective and has a relatively good safety profile in children with severe systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It should be considered in the recommendations as a first-line treatment of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.