Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504964›Full record

ArticleBehaviour2012

Behavioral characteristics of pair bonding in the black tufted-ear marmoset (

Anders Ågmo, Adam S Smith, Andrew K Birnie, Jeffrey A French

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behaviour, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The neural circuits of monogamous behavior.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The influence of androgenic steroid hormones on female aggression in 'atypical' mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anders ÅgmoDepartment of Psychology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Adam S SmithDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Andrew K BirnieDepartment of Psychology and Callitrichid Research Facility, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Jeffrey A FrenchDepartment of Psychology and Callitrichid Research Facility, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
University of Nebraska at Omaha · USFlorida State University · USUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

Parenting, Sibling-Support, and Infant DevelopmentR01HD042882 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI FRENCH, JEFFREY A · 2002 to 2014
$1.7M
Parenting, Sibling-Support, and Infant DevelopmentR56HD042882 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI FRENCH, JEFFREY A · 2008 to 2008
$175k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042882NICHD NIH HHS R56 HD042882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study describes how the development of a pair bond modifies social, sexual and aggressive behavior. Five heterosexual pairs of marmosets, previously unknown to each other, were formed at the beginning of the study. At the onset of pairing, social, sexual, exploratory and aggressive behaviors were recorded for 40 min. The animals were then observed for 20 min, both in the morning and afternoon for 21 days. The frequency and/or duration of behaviors recorded on Day 1 were compared to those recorded at later observations. The behavior displayed shortly after pairing should be completely unaffected by the pair bond, while such a bond should be present at later observations. Thus, it was possible to determine how the behavior between the pair was modified by the development of a pair bond. Social behaviors increased from Day 1 to Days 2-6 and all subsequent days observed. Conversely, other behaviors, such as open mouth displays (usually considered to be an invitation to sexual activity), had a high frequency during the early part of cohabitation but declined towards the end. Consequently, pair bonding manifests itself in an increased intensity of social behaviors. It is suggested that the intrinsically rewarding properties of grooming and perhaps other social behaviors turn the pair mate into a positive incentive, activating approach and further interactions when possible. Thus, the pair bond may be a motivational state activated by the conditioned incentive properties of the partner. This notion can explain all forms of pair bonds, including those occurring between individuals of the same sex and in promiscuous species.

Indexed as

marmosetpair bondingsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID30504964
PMCPMC6261535
OpenAlexW2042675543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.