Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504873›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Comparing phenotypic variation between inbred and outbred mice.

Alexander H Tuttle, Vivek M Philip, Elissa J Chesler, Jeffrey S Mogil

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Building Disease Models for Endometriosis: iPSCs as Game-Changers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Sikkim mouse (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander H TuttleUNC Neuroscience Centre, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Vivek M PhilipThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Elissa J CheslerThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-5062
Jeffrey S MogilAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. jeffrey.mogil@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1359-5720

Funding

Project 5: Circadian RhythmsP50DA039841 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2016 to 2026
$26.2M
Discovery of Addiction-Related Genes with Advanced Mouse ResourcesR01DA037927 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI CHESLER, ELISSA J · 2015 to 2025
$8.1M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039841NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, PopulationGenetic VariationAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, Mutant Strains

Identifiers

PMID30504873
PMCPMC6518396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.