Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Contrasting phylogeographic pattern among Eudyptes penguins around the Southern Ocean.

M J Frugone, A Lowther, D Noll, B Ramos, P Pistorius, G P M Dantas, M V Petry, F Bonadonna, A Steinfurth, A Polanowski and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genome-wide analyses reveal drivers of penguin diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

M J FrugonePontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436, RM, Santiago, Chile.
A LowtherNorwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, N-9297, Norway.
D NollPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436, RM, Santiago, Chile.
B RamosPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436, RM, Santiago, Chile.
P PistoriusDST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute for African Ornithology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa.
G P M DantasPontificia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PPG in Vertebrate Zoology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
M V PetryUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, Laboratório de Ornitologia e Animais Marinhos, Av. Unisinos 950, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil.
F BonadonnaCEFE UMR 5175, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier, EPHE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293, Montpellier cedex 5, Montpellier, France.
A SteinfurthFitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, 7700, Rondebosch, South Africa.
A PolanowskiAustralian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia.
A Raya ReyCentro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CADIC-CONICET), Bernardo Houssay 200, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
N A LoisCentro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CADIC-CONICET), Bernardo Houssay 200, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
K PützAntarctic Research Trust, Zürich, Am Oste-Hamme-Kanal 10, 27432, Bremervörde, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1375-2669
P TrathanBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK CB3 0ET, United Kingdom.
B WieneckeAustralian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway Kingston, Tasmania, 7050, Australia.
E PoulinInstituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-0969
J A ViannaPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, 7820436, RM, Santiago, Chile. jvianna@uc.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-7825
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLAustralian Antarctic Division · AUConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARBritish Antarctic Survey · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute of Ecology and Biodiversity · CLNelson Mandela University · ZANorwegian Polar Institute · NOPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds · GBUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since at least the middle-Miocene, the Antarctic Polar Front (APF) and the Subtropical Front (STF) appear to have been the main drivers of diversification of marine biota in the Southern Ocean. However, highly migratory marine birds and mammals challenge this paradigm and the importance of oceanographic barriers. Eudyptes penguins range from the Antarctic Peninsula to subantarctic islands and some of the southernmost subtropical islands. Because of recent diversification, the number of species remains uncertain. Here we analyze two mtDNA (HVRI, COI) and two nuclear (ODC, AK1) markers from 13 locations of five putative Eudyptes species: rockhopper (E. filholi, E. chrysocome, and E. moseleyi), macaroni (E. chrysolophus) and royal penguins (E. schlegeli). Our results show a strong phylogeographic structure among rockhopper penguins from South America, subantarctic and subtropical islands supporting the recognition of three separated species of rockhopper penguins. Although genetic divergence was neither observed among macaroni penguins from the Antarctic Peninsula and sub-Antarctic islands nor between macaroni and royal penguins, population genetic analyses revealed population genetic structure in both cases. We suggest that the APF and STF can act as barriers for these species. While the geographic distance between colonies might play a role, their impact/incidence on gene flow may vary between species and colonies.

Identifiers

PMID30504851
PMCPMC6269470
OpenAlexW2902462651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.