Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504491›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Protocol for a participatory study for developing qualitative instruments measuring the quality of long-term care relationships.

Aukelien Scheffelaar, Michelle Hendriks, Nanne Bos, Katrien Luijkx, Sandra van Dulmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aukelien ScheffelaarNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michelle HendriksNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nanne BosNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katrien LuijkxTranzo Academic Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn long-term care (LTC), it is unclear which qualitative instruments are most effective and useful for monitoring the quality of the care relationship from the client's perspective. In this paper, we describe the research design for a study aimed at finding and optimising the most suitable and useful qualitative instruments for monitoring the care relationship in LTC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will be performed in three organisations providing care to the following client groups: physically or mentally frail elderly, people with mental health problems and people with intellectual disabilities. Using a participatory research method, we will determine which determinants influence the quality of a care relationship and we will evaluate up to six instruments in cooperation with client-researchers. We will also determine whether the instruments (or parts thereof) can be applied across different LTC settings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol describes a participatory research design for evaluating the quality of the care relationship in LTC. The Medical Ethics Committee of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre decided that formal approval was not needed under the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. This research project will result in a toolbox and implementation plan, which can be used by clients and care professionals to measure and improve the care relationship from the client's perspective. The results will also be published in international peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFrail ElderlyFrailtyHealth PersonnelHumansIntellectual DisabilityMental DisordersNetherlandsQualitative Researchcare relationshipclient perspectivelong-term careparticipatory researchqualitative researchquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID30504491
PMCPMC6278792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.