Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504290›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2018

New drugs for acute myeloid leukemia inspired by genomics and when to use them.

Daniel A Pollyea

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting human mitochondrial NAD(P)Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cytotoxic therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: not quite dead yet.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel A PollyeaDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are several years into the "postdiscovery" era in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) thanks to extensive work involving the sequencing of genomes and exomes of countless patients, which has led to routine comprehensive targeted sequencing in clinical care. The ability to unlock the molecular underpinnings of each patient's disease was supposed to usher in a new treatment era in which each patient was assigned, based on her mutational profile, a personalized cocktail of targeted therapies that would snuff the disease into submission with minimal toxicity. Whether we have fully realized the promise of personalized therapy in AML is unclear. Here, I review those new drugs that have been inspired by genomics, discuss others that might be possible and their potential roles, and consider whether the ability to target genomic mutations in a personalized manner constitutes the future of AML therapeutics or is representative of an era that has already passed.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID30504290
PMCPMC6245963
OpenAlexW2910346017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.