Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30504276›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Perceptual Decision-Making: Biases in Post-Error Reaction Times Explained by Attractor Network Dynamics.

Kevin Berlemont, Jean-Pierre Nadal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Post-error slowing is modulated by emotional words.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modelling decision-making biases.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin BerlemontLaboratoire de Physique Statistique, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Université Paris Diderot, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France and kevin.berlemont@lps.ens.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-9878
Jean-Pierre NadalLaboratoire de Physique Statistique, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, Université Paris Diderot, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France and.ORCID 0000-0003-0022-0647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual decision-making is the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies. Most modeling analyses are based on statistical processes of accumulation of evidence. In contrast, very few works confront attractor network models' predictions with empirical data from continuous sequences of trials. Recently however, numerical simulations of a biophysical competitive attractor network model have shown that such a network can describe sequences of decision trials and reproduce repetition biases observed in perceptual decision experiments. Here we get more insights into such effects by considering an extension of the reduced attractor network model of Wong and Wang (2006), taking into account an inhibitory current delivered to the network once a decision has been made. We make explicit the conditions on this inhibitory input for which the network can perform a succession of trials, without being either trapped in the first reached attractor, or losing all memory of the past dynamics. We study in detail how, during a sequence of decision trials, reaction times and performance depend on nonlinear dynamics of the network, and we confront the model behavior with empirical findings on sequential effects. Here we show that, quite remarkably, the network exhibits, qualitatively and with the correct order of magnitude, post-error slowing and post-error improvement in accuracy, two subtle effects reported in behavioral experiments in the absence of any feedback about the correctness of the decision. Our work thus provides evidence that such effects result from intrinsic properties of the nonlinear neural dynamics.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalMemoryModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsPerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSynapsesattractor networksperceptual decision-makingpost-error adjustmentspost-error slowingreaction times

Identifiers

PMID30504276
PMCPMC6382978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.