Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30503623›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

In Toto Imaging of Dynamic Osteoblast Behaviors in Regenerating Skeletal Bone.

Ben D Cox, Alessandro De Simone, Valerie A Tornini, Sumeet P Singh, Stefano Di Talia, Kenneth D Poss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phased ERK responsiveness and developmental robustness regulate teleost skin morphogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ben D CoxDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Alessandro De SimoneDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Valerie A TorniniDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sumeet P SinghDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Stefano Di TaliaDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: stefano.ditalia@duke.edu.
Kenneth D PossDepartment of Cell Biology, Regeneration Next, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: kenneth.poss@duke.edu.

Funding

Regulation of Appendage Regeneration in ZebrafishR01GM074057 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POSS, KENNETH D · 2006 to 2017
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoblasts are matrix-depositing cells that can divide and heal bone injuries. Their deep-tissue location and the slow progression of bone regeneration challenge attempts to capture osteoblast behaviors in live tissue at high spatiotemporal resolution. Here, we have developed an imaging platform to monitor and quantify individual and collective behaviors of osteoblasts in adult zebrafish scales, skeletal body armor discs that regenerate rapidly after loss. Using a panel of transgenic lines that visualize and manipulate osteoblasts, we find that a founder pool of osteoblasts emerges through de novo differentiation within one day of scale plucking. These osteoblasts undergo division events that are largely uniform in frequency and orientation to establish a primordium. Osteoblast proliferation dynamics diversify across the primordium by two days after injury, with cell divisions focused near, and with orientations parallel to, the scale periphery, occurring coincident with dynamic localization of fgf20a gene expression. In posterior scale regions, cell elongation events initiate in areas soon occupied by mineralized grooves called radii, beginning approximately 2 days post injury, with patterned osteoblast death events accompanying maturation of these radii. By imaging at single-cell resolution, we detail acquisition of spatiotemporally distinct cell division, motility, and death dynamics within a founder osteoblast pool as bone regenerates.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBone RegenerationCell DifferentiationCell DivisionOptical ImagingOsteoblastsSingle-Cell AnalysisZebrafishbonedifferentiationfibroblast growth factorlive imagingosteoblastproliferationregenerationscalezebrafish

Identifiers

PMID30503623
PMCPMC6298855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.