Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30503309›Full record

Trial reportClinical breast cancer2019

A Phase II Trial of Older Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving nab-Paclitaxel: Melding the Fields of Geriatrics and Oncology.

Arti Hurria, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Suzette Blanchard, Peggy Burhenn, Christina Haeyoung Yeon, Yuan Yuan, Daneng Li, Vani Katheria, James Ross Waisman, Thehang H Luu and 12 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical breast cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01463072 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Efficacy and Tolerability of Nanoparticle Albumin Bound Paclitaxel (Abraxane) in Patients 65 and Older With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2012 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsLocally Advanced Breast Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Carcinoma, Recurrent Breast Carcinoma, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7ArmsLaboratory Biomarker Analysis, Nab-paclitaxel, Questionnaire Administration
NCT02027428 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate Nab-Paclitaxel (Abraxane®) as Maintenance Treatment After Induction With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Subjects With Squamous Cell Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2014 to 2019Enrolled427ConditionsSquamous Cell Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungArmsAbraxane (Induction), Carboplatin (Induction), Abraxane (Maintenance), Best Supportive Care (Maintenance)
NCT02250326 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Second/Third-Line Treatment With NAB®-Paclitaxel (ABI-007) In Combination With Epigenetic Modifying Therapy Of CC-486, Or Immunotherapy of Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Or As Monotherapy In Subjects With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Abound.2L+

TypeinterventionalSponsorCelgeneRan2015 to 2023Enrolled240ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungArmsnab-paclitaxel IV, CC-486, Duravalumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive value of the Cancer and Aging Research Group Score for chemotherapy toxicities in older adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arti HurriaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA. Electronic address: ahurria@coh.org.
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-CelisCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico.
Suzette BlanchardCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Peggy BurhennCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Christina Haeyoung YeonCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Yuan YuanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Daneng LiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Vani KatheriaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
James Ross WaismanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Thehang H LuuCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
George SomloCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Anne M NoonanThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Ty LeeCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Nimit SudanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Samuel ChungCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Arnold RotterCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Anait ArsenyanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Abrahm LeviCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Jennifer ChoiCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Andrea RubalcavaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Rachel MorrisonCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
Joanne E MortimerCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
City of Hope · USBeckman Research InstituteThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Mentoring the Next Generation of Geriatric Oncology Researchers in Patient-Oriented Research to Improve the Care of Older Adults with CancerK24AG055693 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WILLIAM DALE · 2018 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NIA NIH HHS K24 AG055693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhase II clinical trials including geriatric assessment (GA) measures are critical for improving the evidence base for older adults with cancer. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of nab-paclitaxel in older adults with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients aged ≥ 65 years with MBC and ≤ 1 previous line of chemotherapy received 100 mg of nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A GA was completed pre-chemotherapy, and the validated Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemotherapy toxicity risk score was calculated. Relationships between tolerability (number of courses, hospitalizations, dose reductions, and toxicity) and risk score were assessed using general linear models, Student t tests, and the Fisher test. Response rate and progression-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsForty patients (mean age, 73 years; range, 65-87 years) were included. The median number of cycles was 6, 75% (n = 30) of patients had ≥ 1 dose hold, and 50% (n = 20) had ≥ 1 dose reduction. Fifty-eight percent (n = 23) had treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicities, and 30% (n = 12) were hospitalized owing to toxicity. Thirty-five percent (n = 14) responded, and the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5 months to undefined). Patients with intermediate/high toxicity risk scores had higher risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity than those with low risk scores (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-33.1; P = .01). A higher mean risk score was associated with higher likelihood of dose reductions and hospitalizations.

conclusionsAmong older adults with MBC receiving weekly nab-paclitaxel, more than one-half experienced ≥ grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity. However, a GA-based risk score could predict treatment tolerability.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsPaclitaxelAgedAged, 80 and overBreast Neoplasms, MaleDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisTreatment Outcome130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelDrug ToxicityElderlyGeriatric assessmentHospitalizationsTaxane

Identifiers

PMID30503309
PMCPMC8842512
OpenAlexW2896647649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.