ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2019
Evaluating Surgical Resident Needle Insertion Skill Gains in Central Venous Catheterization Training.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cannulation Skill Assessment Using Functional Data Analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Article
- Going the (social) distance: Comparing the effectiveness of online versus in-person Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization procedural training.American journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-guided pediatric vascular cannulation by inexperienced operators: outcomes in a training model.Journal of ultrasound · 2022Observational
- Evaluation of the ideal length of the Seldinger needle for internal jugular vein catheter placement.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Biomechanical analysis of expert anesthesiologists and novice residents performing a simulated central venous access procedure.PloS one · 2021Article
- Extracting Subtask-specific Metrics Toward Objective Assessment of Needle Insertion Skill for Hemodialysis Cannulation.Journal of medical robotics researchArticle
- Tapping into Efficient Learning: An Exploration of the Impact of Sequential Learning on Skill Gains and Learning Curves in Central Venous Catheterization Simulator Training.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraining for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization (CVC) is typically conducted on static manikin simulators with real-time feedback from a skilled observer. Dynamic haptic robotic trainers (DHRTs) are an alternative method that simulates various patient anatomies and provides consistent feedback for each insertion. This study evaluates CVC needle insertion efficiency and skill gains of both methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-two first-year surgical residents were trained by placing internal jugular (IJ) CVC needles in manikins (n = 26) or robots (n = 26). Manikin-trained participants received verbal feedback from an experienced observer, whereas robotically trained participants received quantitative feedback from the personalized DHRT learning interface. All participants were pretested on a Blue Phantom manikin; participants completed posttesting on a Blue Phantom manikin (n = 26) or a novel manikin (n = 26) with different vessel depth and position. During pretests and posttests residents were timed, motion-tracked, and scored on an IJ CVC checklist.
results(1) All skills on the IJ CVC checklist showed significant (P < 0.014) improvements from pretests to posttest; (2) Average angle of insertion, path length, and jerk improved significantly (P < 0.005); (3) Average procedural completion time, with standard error (SE) reported, decreased significantly from pretest (M = 3.516 min, SE = 0.277) to posttest (M = 1.997, SE = 0.409).
conclusionsNo significant group differences were observed in overall skill gains, but residents' average procedural completion time decreased significantly from pretests to posttest. Overall results support DHRT as an effective method for training IJ CVC skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.