Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30501099›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Ting Lian, Qi Wu, Brian A Hodge, Kenneth A Wilson, Guixiang Yu, Mingyao Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Useful Flies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting LianInstitute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China. lianting@sicau.edu.cn.
Qi WuInstitute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China. 18728153863@163.com.
Brian A HodgeBuck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Blvd., Novato, CA 94947, USA. BHodge@buckinstitute.org.
Kenneth A WilsonBuck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Blvd., Novato, CA 94947, USA. kawilson@buckinstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-9977
Guixiang YuInstitute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China. Yugx1102@163.com.
Mingyao YangInstitute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China. yangmingyao@sicau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-2738
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is often defined as the accumulation of damage at the molecular and cellular levels which, over time, results in marked physiological impairments throughout the organism. Dietary restriction (DR) has been recognized as one of the strongest lifespan extending therapies observed in a wide array of organisms. Recent studies aimed at elucidating how DR promotes healthy aging have demonstrated a vital role of the digestive tract in mediating the beneficial effects of DR. Here, we review how dietary restriction influences gut metabolic homeostasis and immune function. Our discussion is focused on studies of the

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionLongevityAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinal MucosaDrosophila Proteinsagingdietary restrictionDrosophilagutintestinal epithelia barrier

Identifiers

PMID30501099
PMCPMC6320777
OpenAlexW2902237102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.