Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30500991›Full record

ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2019

Computational aspects underlying genome to phenome analysis in plants.

Anthony M Bolger, Hendrik Poorter, Kathryn Dumschott, Marie E Bolger, Daniel Arend, Sonia Osorio, Heidrun Gundlach, Klaus F X Mayer, Matthias Lange, Uwe Scholz and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Special Issue "Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding 3.0 and 4.0".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Data synthesis for crop variety evaluation. A review.Agronomy for sustainable development · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anthony M BolgerInstitute for Biology I, BioSC, RWTH Aachen University, Worringer Weg 3, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Hendrik PoorterForschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ) Institute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-2) Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Kathryn DumschottInstitute for Biology I, BioSC, RWTH Aachen University, Worringer Weg 3, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Marie E BolgerForschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ) Institute of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-2) Plant Sciences, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428, Jülich, Germany.
Daniel ArendLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Sonia OsorioDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea "La Mayora", Universidad de Málaga-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Campus de Teatinos, 29071, Málaga, Spain.
Heidrun GundlachPlant Genome and Systems Biology (PGSB), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Klaus F X MayerPlant Genome and Systems Biology (PGSB), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Matthias LangeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Uwe ScholzLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Björn UsadelInstitute for Biology I, BioSC, RWTH Aachen University, Worringer Weg 3, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics technologies have greatly accelerated the progress in both fundamental plant science and applied breeding research. Concurrently, high-throughput plant phenotyping is becoming widely adopted in the plant community, promising to alleviate the phenotypic bottleneck. While these technological breakthroughs are significantly accelerating quantitative trait locus (QTL) and causal gene identification, challenges to enable even more sophisticated analyses remain. In particular, care needs to be taken to standardize, describe and conduct experiments robustly while relying on plant physiology expertise. In this article, we review the state of the art regarding genome assembly and the future potential of pangenomics in plant research. We also describe the necessity of standardizing and describing phenotypic studies using the Minimum Information About a Plant Phenotyping Experiment (MIAPPE) standard to enable the reuse and integration of phenotypic data. In addition, we show how deep phenotypic data might yield novel trait-trait correlations and review how to link phenotypic data to genomic data. Finally, we provide perspectives on the golden future of machine learning and their potential in linking phenotypes to genomic features.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenomicsMachine LearningPhenomicsGenome, PlantPhenotypePlantsQuantitative Trait Lociphenotypingplant bioinformaticsplant genome annotationplant genomes

Identifiers

PMID30500991
PMCPMC6849790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.