Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30500851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Profiling of victimization, perpetration, and participation: A latent class analysis among people with severe mental illness.

Wendy M M Albers, Diana P K Roeg, Yolanda Nijssen, Jaap van Weeghel, Inge M B Bongers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Longitudinal impact of stigma resistance on mental health among individuals with mental disorders.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendy M M AlbersTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-3895
Diana P K RoegTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4431-7889
Yolanda NijssenTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Jaap van WeeghelTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Inge M B BongersTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with severe mental illness are more prone to victimization and experience more difficulties regarding societal participation than other community members. These experiences vary greatly among individuals. Community mental health care should offer more individualized support by addressing these differences in experience. Therefore, this study aimed to identify subgroups of outpatients with severe mental illness based on their experiences of social participation and victimization.

methodsData from patients with severe mental illness from eight outpatient teams in the Netherlands were used to perform latent class analysis. From the total caseload, 395 patients agreed to participate. Classes were based on: i) criminal victimization incidents, ii) criminal perpetration incidents (Dutch Safety Monitor), iii) experienced discrimination (DISC-12), and iv) social functioning (Social Functioning Scale). Also, to investigate differences between the classes, socio-demographic, clinical, and person-related variables were examined.

resultsThree classes were identified. The Victimized and Perpetrating class (34.4%) had the highest prevalence of discrimination, victimization, and perpetration, and intermediate scores on social functioning subscales. This class also experienced the most problems in other domains, such as psychosocial functioning and quality of life. The Discriminated and Avoiding class (36.4%) had moderate scores for discrimination, victimization and perpetration, and the lowest scores for social functioning and social support. The General Difficulties class (28.8%) had the lowest prevalence of discrimination, victimization, and perpetration, and the highest scores on social functioning. DISCUSSION: These distinct classes offer new insights to mental health professionals in outpatient teams in in their aim to positively influence the patient's social context during rehabilitation; this includes addressing the role of victimization, and indicates the relevance of distinctive approaches and the support needed for each class. Professionals may need to focus more on the impact of difficulties in their patients' social context to adequately support them in the rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsDiscrimination, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNetherlandsQuality of LifeSocial SupportSocioeconomic FactorsStereotyping

Identifiers

PMID30500851
PMCPMC6268008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.