Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30500721›Full record

ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2019

Verb production by individuals with Down syndrome during narration.

Susan J Loveall, Marie Moore Channell, Leonard Abbeduto, Frances A Conners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Language and Ageing in Adults With Down Syndrome: An Analysis of Receptive and Expressive Language Measures.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mental State Language Development in Children With Down Syndrome Versus Typical Development.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan J LoveallUniversity of Mississippi, United States; University of Alabama, United States. Electronic address: sjloveal@go.olemiss.edu.
Marie Moore ChannellUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; University of Alabama, United States.
Leonard AbbedutoMIND Institute and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, United States.
Frances A ConnersUniversity of Alabama, United States.

Funding

Rodent Behavior CoreU54HD079125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HERTZ-PICCIOTTO, IRVA · 2013 to 2019
$8.5M
Cognitive predictors of language impairment in Down syndromeR01HD055345 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI CONNERS, FRANCES A · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055345NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite research identifying verb knowledge as a strong predictor of later syntactic skills in typical development, virtually no research has examined verb development in Down syndrome.

aimsThe purpose of this study was to examine verb production (density, diversity, and type-token ratios) by individuals with Down syndrome in the context of story generation relative to two comparison groups - nonverbal cognitive ability level matches with typical development and chronological age matches with mixed-etiology intellectual disability. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Thirty-five participants with Down syndrome (11-21 years), 27 participants with intellectual disability (13-20 years), and 29 participants with typical development (4-6 years) completed a narrative story generation task. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for verb production. OUTCOMES AND

resultsExamining overall verb production, participants with Down syndrome produced narratives with less verb density than participants with typical development and had smaller verb type-token ratios than participants with intellectual disability. Upon examining lexical verb production, participants with Down syndrome produced narratives with less lexical verb density than participants with typical development. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results indicate that individuals with Down syndrome have a developmentally appropriate diversity of verbs in their lexicon but are not using verbs as frequently as comparison groups.

Indexed as

NarrationSpeechAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDown SyndromeFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleYoung AdultDown syndromeExpressive languageExpressive vocabularyIntellectual disabilityVerbsWord categories

Identifiers

PMID30500721
PMCPMC6326887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.