Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30500439›Full record

ReviewBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2019

Patient-Reported Outcomes with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.

Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Surbhi Sidana, Gunjan L Shah, Michael Scordo, Betty K Hamilton, Navneet S Majhail

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05064787 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Digital Health Coaching Program for Individuals Following CAR T Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorPack HealthRan2022 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsLymphoma, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Leukemia, Multiple MyelomaArmsDigital Health Coaching
NCT05199961 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Quality of Life of Adults With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated With Tisagenlecleucel

TypeinterventionalSponsorPack HealthRan2022 to 2022Enrolled4ConditionsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseArmsDigital Health Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Social determinants of health in studies using PROMs to assess toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Patient-Reported Neuropsychiatric Outcomes of Long-Term Survivors after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The neurotoxic legacy of CAR-T cells: where do we stand?Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Patient-reported outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rajshekhar ChakrabortyTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Surbhi SidanaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gunjan L ShahAdult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael ScordoAdult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Betty K HamiltonTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Navneet S MajhailTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: majhain@ccf.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Integrating health informatics in a scalable stepped care self-management program for survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantationR01CA215134 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BAKER, KEVIN S, MAJHAIL, NAVNEET S. · 2017 to 2022
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important tool to assess the impact of a new therapy on symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies have been approved for use in relapsed or refractory leukemia and lymphoma based on promising efficacy in clinical trials. However, data are lacking on patient-reported toxicity and impact on HRQoL. This review provides an overview of the incorporation of PROs in CAR-T cell therapy and the specific challenges in this context. The first step is to demonstrate feasibility of PRO monitoring in the acute phase after CAR-T cell infusion. Apart from core PRO domains like physical functioning, disease-related symptoms, and symptomatic adverse effects, important measures to consider are cognitive functioning and financial toxicity. Because there are no validated PRO instruments in the setting of CAR-T cell therapy, universally validated measures like Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) could be considered, which is also recommended in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the timeline of toxicities with CAR-T cell therapy, PRO instruments should be administered at baseline and at least weekly in the first 30 days. Subsequently, frequent monitoring of PROs in the first year might be helpful in identifying short- and intermediate-term toxicities, functional limitations, and neuropsychiatric effects. The major potential challenge in acute phase would be missing data when patients develop severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity. Designing a strategy for handling missing data is crucial. The long-term safety of CAR-T cell therapy is not well characterized because of short follow-up in most studies reported thus far. PROs should be measured at least yearly after the first year to identify potential late effects like cognitive deficit or autoimmune manifestations. Collaboration between institutions performing cellular therapy and engagement with patients, clinicians, and statisticians with expertise in PROs are crucial for setting a comprehensive agenda on integration of PROs with CAR-T cell therapy.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresCognitionCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveQuality of LifeReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenChimeric antigen receptor T cell therapyHealth-related quality of lifePatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30500439
PMCPMC6511294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.