ArticleAnalytical chemistry2018
Normalized Retention Time for Targeted Analysis of the DNA Adductome.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-adductomics: Advancing mass spectrometry techniques for comprehensive exposome characterization.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024Article
- Screening DNA Damage in the Rat Kidney and Liver by Untargeted DNA Adductomics.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Article
- LC-MS/MS for Assessing the Incorporation and Repair ofChemical research in toxicology · 2022Article
- Normalized retention time for scheduled liquid chromatography-multistage mass spectrometry analysis of epitranscriptomic modifications.Journal of chromatography. A · 2020Article
- Collision-Induced Dissociation Studies of Protonated Ions of Alkylated Thymidine and 2'-Deoxyguanosine.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020Article
- Methods and Challenges for Computational Data Analysis for DNA Adductomics.Chemical research in toxicology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A wide spectrum of DNA lesions can be generated from byproducts of endogenous metabolism and/or from environmental exposure. A DNA adductomic approach for the robust quantification of DNA adducts in cellular and tissue DNA may facilitate the use of DNA adducts for biomonitoring studies and enable comprehensive assessment about DNA repair. Normalized retention time (iRT) has been widely used in scheduled selected-reaction monitoring (SRM) methods for highly sensitive and high-throughput analyses of protein samples in complicated matrices. By using a similar method, we established the iRT scores for 36 modified nucleosides from the retention times of the four canonical 2'-deoxynucleosides on a nanoflow liquid chromatography-nanospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-NSI-MS/MS) system. The iRT scores facilitated reliable prediction of retention time and were employed for establishing a scheduled SRM method for quantitative assessment of a subset of the DNA adductome. The quantification results of the scheduled SRM method were more accurate and precise than those from an unscheduled method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.