Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30500065›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2019

Use of an alternative method to evaluate erythema severity in a clinical trial: difference in vehicle response with evaluation of baseline and postdose photographs for effect of oxymetazoline cream 1·0% for persistent erythema of rosacea in a phase IV study.

L F Eichenfield, J Q Del Rosso, J K L Tan, A A Hebert, G F Webster, J Harper, H E Baldwin, L H Kircik, L Stein-Gold, A Kaoukhov and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Effectiveness of VISIA system in evaluating the severity of rosacea.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

L F EichenfieldUniversity of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
J Q Del RossoJDR Dermatology Research/Thomas Dermatology, Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A.
J K L TanWindsor Clinical Research Inc., Windsor, ON, Canada.
A A HebertUTHealth McGovern Medical School, Department of Dermatology, Houston, TX, U.S.A.
G F WebsterWebster Dermatology, P.A., Hockessin, DE, U.S.A.
J HarperDermatology and Skin Care Center of Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, U.S.A.
H E BaldwinThe Acne Treatment and Research Center, Morristown, NJ, U.S.A.
L H KircikDermResearch, PLLC, Louisville, KY, U.S.A.
L Stein-GoldHenry Ford Health System, West Bloomfield, MI, U.S.A.
A KaoukhovAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, U.S.A.
N AlvandiAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, U.S.A.
Allergan (United States) · USGold Skin Care Center · USHenry Ford Health System · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USWebster University · USWindsor Clinical Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnce-daily topical oxymetazoline cream 1·0% significantly reduced persistent facial erythema of rosacea in trials requiring live, static patient assessments.

objectivesTo evaluate critically the methodology of clinical trials that require live, static patient assessments by determining whether assessment of erythema is different when reference to the baseline photograph is allowed.

methodsIn two identically designed, randomized, phase III trials, adults with persistent facial erythema of rosacea applied oxymetazoline or vehicle once daily. This phase IV study evaluated standardized digital facial photographs from the phase III trials to record ≥ 1-grade Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) improvement at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 h postdose.

resultsAmong 835 patients (oxymetazoline n = 415, vehicle n = 420), significantly greater proportions of patients treated with oxymetazoline vs. vehicle achieved ≥ 1-grade CEA improvement. For the comparison between phase IV study results and the original phase III analysis, when reference to baseline photographs was allowed while evaluating post-treatment photographs, the results for oxymetazoline were similar to results of the phase III trials (up to 85.7%), but a significantly lower proportion of vehicle recipients achieved ≥ 1-grade CEA improvement (up to 29.7% [phase 4] vs. 52.3% [phase 3]; P<0.001). In the phase IV study, up to 80·2% of patients treated with oxymetazoline achieved at least moderate erythema improvement vs. up to 22·9% of patients treated with vehicle. The association between patients' satisfaction with facial skin redness and percentage of erythema improvement was statistically significant.

conclusionsAssessment of study photographs, with comparison to baseline, confirmed significant erythema reduction with oxymetazoline on the first day of application. Compared with the phase III trial results, significantly fewer vehicle recipients attained ≥ 1-grade CEA improvement, suggesting a mitigated vehicle effect. This methodology may improve the accuracy of clinical trials evaluating erythema severity.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexErythemaFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxymetazolinePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionPhotographyResearch DesignRosaceaSkinSkin CreamTreatment OutcomeOxymetazoline

Identifiers

PMID30500065
PMCPMC6850476
OpenAlexW2902260894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.