Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30499237›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2019

Sustained 52-week efficacy and safety of triple therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with sitagliptin added to metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Yehuda Handelsman, Chantal Mathieu, Stefano Del Prato, Eva Johnsson, Raisa Kurlyandskaya, Nayyar Iqbal, Ricardo Garcia-Sanchez, Julio Rosenstock

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. DPP-4 Inhibition and the Path to Clinical Proof.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yehuda HandelsmanMetabolic Institute of America, Tarzana, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-0247
Chantal MathieuClinical and Experimental Endocrinology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4055-5233
Stefano Del PratoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-0270
Eva JohnssonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Raisa KurlyandskayaAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Nayyar IqbalAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Ricardo Garcia-SanchezAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-3275
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEAstraZeneca (United States) · USDallas Diabetes Research Center · USTarzana Treatment Centers · USUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of an intensification strategy of early triple combination therapy with dapagliflozin (DAPA) plus saxagliptin (SAXA) to a dual therapy strategy with sitagliptin (SITA) in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin (MET) monotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multinational, active-controlled, parallel-group phase 3b trial randomized 461 patients, at least 18 years of age, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 8%-10.5% (64-91 mmol/mol), to either DAPA plus SAXA or SITA, added to MET, for a 26-week double-blind treatment period and an extension of a 26-week blinded treatment period.

resultsMean (± SD) baseline HbA1c was 8.8% ± 0.9% (73.0 ± 9.3 mmol/mol). DAPA plus SAXA (n = 232) provided a greater reduction from baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 26 and 52 compared with SITA (n = 229) (adjusted mean ± SE change, Week 26: -1.41 ± 0.07% vs -1.07 ± 0.07% [-15.4 ± 0.8 mmol/mol vs 11.7 ± 0.8 mmol/mol]; P = 0.0008; Week 52: -1.29 ± 0.08% vs -0.81 ± 0.09% [14.1 ± 0.9 mmol/mol vs 8.9 ± 1.0 mmol/mol]). The between-group difference in adjusted mean (95% CI) change from baseline in HbA1c increased from -0.34 (-0.54, -0.14) at Week 26 to -0.48 (-0.71, -0.25) at Week 52. DAPA plus SAXA was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment arms.

conclusionsEarly intensification to triple therapy with DAPA plus SAXA results in better, more durable glycaemic control than addition of SITA only (dual therapy) in patients with high HbA1c levels who are uncontrolled with MET monotherapy.

Indexed as

AdamantaneAgedBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DipeptidesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetforminAdamantaneBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucosedapagliflozinDipeptidesGlucosidesGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminsaxagliptinSitagliptin PhosphatedapagliflozinDPP-IV inhibitorGLP-1saxagliptinSGLT2 inhibitortype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30499237
PMCPMC6667916
OpenAlexW2902165101

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.