Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498941›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2019

Analysis of Bacterial Communities in White Clover Seeds via High-Throughput Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene.

Wenna Gao, Chunsheng Zheng, Yahong Lei, Weigang Kuang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenna GaoBeijing Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Beijing, 100026, China.
Chunsheng ZhengBeijing Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Beijing, 100026, China.
Yahong LeiThe Talents Exchange and Development Service Centre of Wuwei City, Wuwei, 733000, China.
Weigang KuangCollege of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China. kwing23@126.com.

Funding

Foundation of the Educational Department in Jiangxi Province GJJ170294National Quality Supervision and Inspection Bureau of Science and Technology Planning Project 2014IK005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White clover widely cultivated in China is one of the most important perennial leguminous forages in temperate and subtropical regions. There is a large quantity of white clover seeds imported into China each year for demands of high-quality grass seeds. Seedborne diseases may cause significant economic losses. DNA sequencing technologies allow for the direct estimation of microbial community diversity, avoiding culture-based biases. Therefore, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to investigate the bacterial communities in white clover seeds collected from four different countries. The results showed that a total of 484,715 clean reads were obtained for further subsequent analysis. In total, 341, 340, 382, and 297 operational taxonomic units were obtained at 3% distance cutoff in DB, MB, TB, and XB samples, respectively. The richness indexes revealed that TB sample from Argentina had the highest bacterial richness in four samples. Our results demonstrated that Proteobacteria was the dominant phyla in MB, TB, and XB; however, Bacteroidetes was the dominant phyla in DB. The dominant genus of DB was Prevotella (11.9%), while Sphingomonas was the major genus of MB (46.9%), TB (55.08%), and XB (47.2%) samples. These results provide useful information for seedborne diseases and transmission of bacteria from seed to seedling.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaArgentinaBacteriaBacterial Typing TechniquesBacteroidetesDenmarkDNA, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMedicagoNew ZealandPhylogenyProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeedsUnited StatesDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.