Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498886›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2019

Fluorine polymer probes for magnetic resonance imaging: quo vadis?

Daniel Jirak, Andrea Galisova, Kristyna Kolouchova, David Babuka, Martin Hruby

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bypassing Heteronuclear MRI: Metal-Free Organosilicon Nanotracers for Background-Free HotspotAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital Light Processing ofMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-termNanoscale advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Synthesis ofBiomacromolecules · 2022
    Article
  18. ChemMedChem · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel JirakInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 9, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic. daniel.jirak@ikem.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-3462
Andrea GalisovaInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 9, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Kristyna KolouchovaInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovského sq. 2, 162 06, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
David BabukaInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovského sq. 2, 162 06, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Martin HrubyInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovského sq. 2, 162 06, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZTechnical University of Liberec · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few years, the development and relevance of

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaFluorineFluorine-19 Magnetic Resonance ImagingFluorocarbonsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLightMiceMolecular ImagingMolecular ProbesPolymersReactive Oxygen SpeciesScattering, RadiationTemperatureContrast MediaFluorineFluorocarbonsMolecular ProbesPolymersReactive Oxygen Species19F MRI probeFluorineMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Molecular imagingPolymer

Identifiers

PMID30498886
PMCPMC6514090
OpenAlexW2902574196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.