Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498878›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

An inter-subject model to reduce the calibration time for motion imagination-based brain-computer interface.

Yijun Zou, Xingang Zhao, Yaqi Chu, Yiwen Zhao, Weiliang Xu, Jianda Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yijun ZouUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Xingang ZhaoKey Laboratory of Networked Control System, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China. zhaoxingang@sia.cn.
Yaqi ChuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Yiwen ZhaoKey Laboratory of Networked Control System, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.
Weiliang XuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jianda HanKey Laboratory of Networked Control System, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China.

Funding

National High Technology Research and Development Program of China 2015AA042301the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61503374the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61573340the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61773369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major factor blocking the practical application of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) is the long calibration time. To obtain enough training trials, participants must spend a long time in the calibration stage. In this paper, we propose a new framework to reduce the calibration time through knowledge transferred from the electroencephalogram (EEG) of other subjects. We trained the motor recognition model for the target subject using both the target's EEG signal and the EEG signals of other subjects. To reduce the individual variation of different datasets, we proposed two data mapping methods. These two methods separately diminished the variation caused by dissimilarities in the brain activation region and the strength of the brain activation in different subjects. After these data mapping stages, we adopted an ensemble method to aggregate the EEG signals from all subjects into a final model. We compared our method with other methods that reduce the calibration time. The results showed that our method achieves a satisfactory recognition accuracy using very few training trials (32 samples). Compared with existing methods using few training trials, our method achieved much greater accuracy. Graphical abstract The framework of the proposed method. The workflow of the framework have three steps: 1, process each subjects EEG signals according to the target subject's EEG signal. 2, generate models from each subjects' processed signals. 3, ensemble these models to a final model, the final model is a model for the target subject.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesImaginationModels, NeurologicalMotionAlgorithmsCalibrationHumansTime FactorsBrain-computer interface (BCI)Common spatial patternElectroencephalogram (EEG)Inter-subject modelMachine learningMovement imagination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.