Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498869›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2019

Pre- and perinatal factors and incidence of breast cancer in the Black Women's Health Study.

Lauren E Barber, Kimberly A Bertrand, Lynn Rosenberg, Tracy A Battaglia, Julie R Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren E BarberDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7321-6003
Kimberly A BertrandSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, 72 East Concord Street, L-7, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Lynn RosenbergSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, 72 East Concord Street, L-7, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Tracy A BattagliaBoston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, 72 East Concord Street, L-7, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. jpalmer@bu.edu.
Boston University · US

Funding

A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenU01CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Kimberly A. Bertrand, Yvette C Cozier · 2017 to 2026
$24.0M
FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenUM1CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 2012 to 2017
$13.7M
National Cancer Institute R01CA058420National Cancer Institute U01CA164974National Cancer Institute UM1CA164974NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164974NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164974Susan G. Komen GTDR15331228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to investigate the association between pre- or perinatal factors and breast cancer risk among African American women.

methodsParticipants in the Black Women's Health Study, a prospective cohort of 59,000 African American women, reported birth weight, preterm birth, twin or triplet status, maternal age at birth, birth order, and having been breastfed during infancy at various times during follow-up from 1997 to 2015. Numbers of incident cases ranged from 312 for breastfed analyses to 1,583 for twin or triplet analyses. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between each factor and breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor (ER) status.

resultsCompared to birth weights of 5 lbs. 8 oz.-8 lbs. 13 oz., low (< 5 lbs. 8 oz.) and high (> 8 lbs. 13 oz.) birth weights were associated with increased breast cancer risk; HRs (95% CI) were 1.19 (0.98-1.44) and 1.26 (0.97-1.63), respectively. Associations were similar by ER status. Having been born to a mother aged ≥ 35 years versus < 20 years was associated with risk of ER+ (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.10-2.29), but not ER- breast cancer. Other perinatal factors were not associated with breast cancer.

conclusionAfrican American women with a low or high birth weight or born to older mothers may have increased breast cancer risk. Trends towards delayed child birth and higher birth weights, coupled with disproportionately high rates of low birth weight among African Americans, may contribute to increases in breast cancer incidence.

Indexed as

Birth WeightAdultBirth OrderBlack or African AmericanBreast FeedingBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedParturitionPregnancyProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAfrican American womenBreast cancerPerinatal factorsPrenatal factors

Identifiers

PMID30498869
PMCPMC6521832
OpenAlexW2902669073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.