Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498845›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Palliative care in everyday practice of radiation oncologists : Results from a web-based survey among medical members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).

Janina Fels, Steffi Pigorsch, Hilke Vorwerk, Rita Engenhart-Cabillic, Birgitt van Oorschot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Analysis of radiation oncology integration within general practitioners' daily patient care: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  3. Survey in radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: state of digitalization by 2023.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  4. Palliative care on the radiation oncology ward-improvements in clinical care through interdisciplinary ward rounds.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  5. Trends in radiotherapy inpatient admissions in Germany: a population-based study over a 10-year period.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiation oncologists role, training and perceptions in palliative care: a systematic review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janina FelsDepartment of Geriatrics, Clinic of Vitanas, Berlin, Germany. J.Fels@vitanas.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-3349
Steffi PigorschDepartment of RadioOncology, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Hilke VorwerkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Rita Engenhart-CabillicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Birgitt van OorschotInterdisciplinary centre for palliative medicine and Department of Radiation Oncology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle is known about the attitudes of radiation oncologists towards palliative care, about their competences in this field, and about the collaboration with palliative care specialists. Our aim was to close this gap and understand more about the importance of an additional qualification in palliative care.

methodsMedical members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) were electronically surveyed during November-December 2016.

resultsThe survey was emailed successfully to 1110 addressees, whereas a total of 205 questionnaires were eligible for analysis (response rate 18.4%). 55 (26.8%) of the respondents had an additional qualification in palliative care. Physicians who had an additional qualification in palliative care (PC qualification) reported palliative care needs for their patients more frequently than the other respondents (89.0 vs. 82.7%, p = 0.008). Furthermore, they were most likely to report a high confidence in palliative care competences, such as "communication skills & support for relatives" (83.6 vs. 59.3%, p = 0.013), "symptom control," and "pain management" (94.5 vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001 and 90.9 vs. 73.3%, p = 0.008, respectively). Respondents with a PC qualification more often involved palliative care specialists than the other respondents (63.3 vs. 39.3%, p = 0.007). Perceived main barriers regarding palliative care in radiation oncology included time aspects (9.2%), stigmata (8.5%), and the lack of interdisciplinary collaboration (8.5%).

conclusionsThis analysis demonstrated that aspects of palliative care strongly impact on daily practice in radiation oncology. Additional qualifications and comprehensive training in palliative medicine may contribute to improved patient care in radiation oncology.

Indexed as

Societies, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateGermanyHealth Care SurveysHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationInternetIntersectoral CollaborationPalliative CareRadiation OncologistsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdditional qualificationBarriers to palliative careEnd of lifeRadiation therapySurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.