ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2018
Measuring Sarcopenia Severity in Older Adults and the Value of Effective Interventions.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The evidence and impact of deprescribing on sarcopenia parameters: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Sarcopenia Severity and the Accumulation of Geriatric Syndromes Among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study from Vietnam.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic CT versus clinical methods for sarcopenia screening.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Association of Serum Creatinine-Cystatin C Ratio With Hospital-Associated Complications and Post-Discharge Mortality.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Observational
- Predicting Slow Walking Speed From a Pooled Cohort Analysis: Sarcopenia Definitions, Agreement, and Prevalence in Australia and New Zealand.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of Habitual and Maximal Gait Speed and their Impact on Sarcopenia Quantification in German Nursing Home Residents.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2022Article
- Genetic variation ineLife · 2022Article
- Whey for Sarcopenia; Can Whey Peptides, Hydrolysates or Proteins Play a Beneficial Role?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Clinically Meaningful Change for Physical Performance: Perspectives of the ICFSR Task Force.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLittle is known about the severity and long-term health and economic consequences of sarcopenia. We developed a sarcopenia index to measure severity in older Americans and estimated the long-term societal benefits generated by effective interventions to mitigate severity.
designUsing a micro-simulation model, we quantified the potential societal value generated in the US in 2010-2040 by reductions in sarcopenia severity in older adults. All analyses were performed in Stata and SAS. SETTING AND
participantsSecondary data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (N = 1634) and Health and Retirement Study (HRS) (N = 952) were used to develop a sarcopenia severity index in older adults. MEASUREMENTS: Multi-trait multi-method and factor analyses were used to validate and calibrate the sarcopenia severity index, which was modeled as a function of gait speed, walking without an assistive device, and moderate physical activity.
resultsIn representative elderly populations, reducing sarcopenia severity by improving gait speed by 0.1 m/s in those with gait speed under 0.8 m/s generated a cumulative benefit of $65B by 2040 (2015 dollars). Improving walking ability in those with walking difficulty generated cumulative social benefit of $787B by 2040.
conclusionsReducing sarcopenia severity would generate significant health and economic benefits to society-almost $800B in the most optimistic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.