Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498637›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

Regional fresh snowfall microbiology and chemistry are driven by geography in storm-tracked events, Colorado, USA.

Alexander S Honeyman, Maria L Day, John R Spear

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disentangling bacterial diversity and biogeography in snow-covered regions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Airborne bacteria confirm the pristine nature of the Southern Ocean boundary layer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander S HoneymanCivil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
Maria L DayCivil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.
John R SpearCivil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4664-7438
Colorado School of Mines · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snowfall is a global phenomenon highly integrated with hydrology and ecology. Forays into studying bioaerosols and their dependence on aeolian movement are largely constrained to either precipitation-independent analyses or in silico models. Though snowpack and glacial microbiological studies have been conducted, little is known about the biological component of meteoric snow. Through culture-independent phylogenetic and geochemical analyses, we show that the geographical location at which snow precipitates determines snowfall's geochemical and microbiological composition. Storm-tracking, furthermore, can be used as a valuable environmental indicator to trace down what factors are influencing bioaerosols. We estimate annual aeolian snowfall deposits of up to ∼10 kg of bacterial/archaeal biomass per hectare along our study area of the eastern Front Range in Colorado. The dominant kinds of microbiota captured in an analysis of seven snow events at two different locations, one urban, one rural, across the winter of 2016/2017 included phyla

Indexed as

Aerosol chemistryAerosolsMicrobial ecologyRemote sensingSnow

Identifiers

PMID30498637
PMCPMC6252068
OpenAlexW2900466632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.