Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498589›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

Using three indicators to understand the parity-specific contribution of adolescent childbearing to all births.

Lenka Benova, Sarah Neal, Emma G Radovich, David A Ross, Manahil Siddiqi, Venkatraman Chandra-Mouli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trends in teenage motherhood in Ecuador: challenges and inequalities.International journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lenka BenovaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sarah NealDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Emma G RadovichFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David A RossDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, London, UK.
Manahil SiddiqiDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research/Human Reproduction Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Venkatraman Chandra-MouliDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research/Human Reproduction Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBWorld Health Organization · CHUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA strong focus on sexual and reproductive health of female adolescents is a key to achieving sustainable development goals, due to the large size of the current cohort in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and adolescents' biological and social vulnerability. Several indicators of fertility among adolescents are in wide use, but the contribution of adolescent births to all births is poorly understood. We propose and calculate a package of three indicators capturing the contribution of adolescent births to all births, stratified by parity (first and second/higher).

methodsWe used Demographic and Health Survey data for 30 LMICs and vital registration for two high-income countries (to calculate levels and trends across a range of countries) for three time periods: 1990-1999, 2000-2009 and 2010-2015. The three indicators were calculated overall and by age thresholds (<16, <18  and <20  years) and exact ages, for each country and time point. Patterns of changes in indicators for the three cumulative thresholds over time are described.

resultsIn the 30 LMICs, the percentage of all live births occurring to adolescents varied across countries, with a median of 18% for adolescents <20  years. Three countries (Jordan, Indonesia and Rwanda) had levels below 10%; Bangladesh had the highest at 33%. The contribution of adolescent first-order births to all first-order births was high; a median of 49%. Even among second-order and higher-order births, the contribution of adolescent childbearing was appreciable (median of 6%). Over the period under examination, the proportion of adolescent births among all live births declined in the majority of the LMICs.

conclusionThese three indicators add to our understanding of the scale of adolescent childbearing and can be used in conjunction with population estimates to assess the absolute need for age-appropriate and parity-appropriate reproductive, maternal and newborn healthcare and to monitor progress in improving young people's health.

Indexed as

adolescent fertilitycross-sectional surveyhealthhealth policies and all other topicsmedical demographyvital registration

Identifiers

PMID30498589
PMCPMC6254748
OpenAlexW2901044112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.