ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018
Normative Data of the Wingate Anaerobic Test in 1 Year Age Groups of Male Soccer Players.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pure maximal glycolytic rate and metabolic contributions during a maximal sprint test across various positions in highly trained football players.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Classifying Soccer Players Based on Physical Capacities and Match-Specific Running Performance Using Machine Learning.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2025Article
- Performance Metrics of Anaerobic Power in Professional Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Fighters.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Reference levels of mean and peak anaerobic power for male and female long-track speed skaters.Biology of sport · 2025Article
- Thermal imaging responses of lower-limb muscles following anaerobic testing in male soccer players: A time-series approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Determination of optimal load in the Wingate Anaerobic Test is not depend on number of sprints included in mathematical models.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- A Simple Field Tapping Test for Evaluating Frequency Qualities of the Lower Limb Neuromuscular System in Soccer Players: A Validity and Reliability Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Multi-Systems Approach to Human Movement after ACL Reconstruction: The Cardiopulmonary System.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022Article
- Changes in energy system contributions to the Wingate anaerobic test in climbers after a high altitude expedition.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- The Relationship of Age and BMI with Physical Fitness in Futsal Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) has been used extensively to evaluate performance in soccer, however, a comprehensive sport-specific normative database has not been available so far. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to develop norms of the main indices of the WAnT with regards to age in soccer. A secondary aim was to examine the relationship of WAnT with two common field tests, 20 m sprint and vertical jump, and study the variation of this relationship by age and playing position. Hundred and ninety five male soccer players (age 18.1 ± 4.9 years) performed the WAnT, and a sub-sample of 190 soccer players (age 19.4 ± 5.1 years) performed 20 m sprint, squat (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ). Age was related very largely with peak power (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.