Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498449›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2018

Biomechanical Characterization at the Cell Scale: Present and Prospects.

Francesco Basoli, Sara Maria Giannitelli, Manuele Gori, Pamela Mozetic, Alessandra Bonfanti, Marcella Trombetta, Alberto Rainer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Recent Advances in 3D Cultures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A primer to traction force microscopy.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco BasoliDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sara Maria GiannitelliDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Manuele GoriDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Pamela MozeticCenter for Translational Medicine, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
Alessandra BonfantiDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marcella TrombettaDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RainerDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly growing field of mechanobiology demands for robust and reproducible characterization of cell mechanical properties. Recent achievements in understanding the mechanical regulation of cell fate largely rely on technological platforms capable of probing the mechanical response of living cells and their physico-chemical interaction with the microenvironment. Besides the established family of atomic force microscopy (AFM) based methods, other approaches include optical, magnetic, and acoustic tweezers, as well as sensing substrates that take advantage of biomaterials chemistry and microfabrication techniques. In this review, we introduce the available methods with an emphasis on the most recent advances, and we discuss the challenges associated with their implementation.

Indexed as

AFMcell-generated forcescell mechanicsmechanobiologymechanotransductionMEMStraction force microscopytweezing methods

Identifiers

PMID30498449
PMCPMC6249385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.