Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2018

Differences in Intercellular Communication During Clinical Relapse and Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Study of the Composition of Extracellular Vesicles in Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Fabiana Geraci, Paolo Ragonese, Maria Magdalena Barreca, Emanuele Aliotta, Maria Antonietta Mazzola, Sabrina Realmuto, Giulia Vazzoler, Giovanni Savettieri, Gabriella Sconzo, Giuseppe Salemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. An Update on Diagnostic Laboratory Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Current and Future Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiana GeraciDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Paolo RagoneseDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Maria Magdalena BarrecaDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Emanuele AliottaDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Maria Antonietta MazzolaDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Sabrina RealmutoDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giulia VazzolerDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni SavettieriDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Gabriella SconzoDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe SalemiDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITIstituto Euro Mediterraneo di Scienza e Tecnologia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed based on the hypothesis that changes in both the levels and surface marker expression of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be associated with the clinical form, disease activity, and severity of multiple sclerosis (MS). The analyzes were performed on subjects affected by MS or other neurological disorders. EVs, which were isolated by ultracentrifugation of CSF samples, were characterized by flow cytometry. A panel of fluorescent antibodies was used to identify the EV origin: CD4, CCR3, CCR5, CD19, and CD200, as well as isolectin IB4. The Mann-Whitney

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluidextracellular vesicleslymphocytesmultiple sclerosissurface markers

Identifiers

PMID30498433
PMCPMC6249419
OpenAlexW2901939621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.