Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498430›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Steven J Meas, Koji Nishimura, Mirko Scheibinger, Alain Dabdoub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cochlear isolation in neonatal mice forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maturation of type I and type II rat vestibular hair cellsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cochlear Sox2Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Steven J MeasDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Koji NishimuraDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Mirko ScheibingerDepartment of Otolaryngology/HNS, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Alain DabdoubDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kyoto University · JPStanford University · USSunnybrook Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss can develop as a consequence of primary auditory neuron degeneration. These neurons are present within the spiral ganglion of the inner ear and co-exist with glial cells that assist in neuronal maintenance and function. There are limited interventions for individuals with hearing impairment, hence novel biological solutions must be explored. Regenerative strategies can benefit from

Indexed as

auditoryFACSgliahearinginner earneuronsprotocolregeneration

Identifiers

PMID30498430
PMCPMC6249511
OpenAlexW2901886178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.