Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498418›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Axillary Management in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Thorsten Kühn, Jean-Marc Classe, Oreste David Gentilini, Corrado Tinterri, Florentia Peintinger, Jana de Boniface

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Future perspectives of surgical treatment of breast cancer.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Thorsten KühnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany.
Jean-Marc ClasseInstitut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Centre Gauducheau, Nantes, France.
Oreste David GentiliniBreast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Corrado TinterriHumanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy.
Florentia PeintingerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital Leoben, Leoben, Austria.
Jana de BonifaceDepartment of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Humanitas University · ITInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEKlinikum Esslingen · DEMedical University of Graz · ATSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axillary surgery has undergone considerable changes in recent years, especially in relation to patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Due to constantly decreasing rates of recurrence and death from breast cancer, modern surgical strategies aim at de-escalating the extent of local treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures. This relates especially to lymph node surgery which is associated with considerable morbidity. In patients who initially present with clinically node-negative disease, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is increasingly performed after NACT. The determination of the post-NACT nodal status does not only spare patients from additional surgery but also allows the assessment of pathologic complete response which is increasingly becoming an important tool for treatment planning. Since more than 70% of these patients have a ypN0 status after NACT, future trials will aim to identify patients who might be spared any axillary surgery after NACT. In patients who initially present with positive lymph nodes, the success rates of SLNB in terms of detection and accuracy are less favorable compared to those in patients who undergo primary surgery. The clinical significance of this is unclear. To reduce unnecessary axillary dissection in patients with cN1ycN0 status, prospective outcome data after SLNB without further lymph node removal are urgently needed. Improvements in surgical technique by localizing positive nodes at the time of diagnosis and removing them in a targeted surgical procedure (targeted axillary dissection) are under evaluation. Risk assessment and patient selection (including gene expression profiles) might be other ways of safely omitting axillary dissection.

Indexed as

Axillary surgeryBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapySentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30498418
PMCPMC6257201
OpenAlexW2892520252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.