Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498405›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2018

Values of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review.

Nick Zonneveld, Naomi Driessen, René A J Stüssgen, Mirella M N Minkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Value-Based Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relying on Trust: A Qualitative Study on Home-Dwelling Older Adults' Experiences and Preferences With Multimorbidity Management in Municipal Healthcare Assessments.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  20. The Safe Environment for Every Kid Model in the Swedish Child Health Services: Adoption and Introduction in a Healthcare Region.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nick ZonneveldTIAS School for Business and Society/Tilburg University, NL.
Naomi DriessenVilans, National Centre of Excellence in Long Term Care, NL.
René A J StüssgenNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NL.
Mirella M N MinkmanTIAS School for Business and Society/Tilburg University, NL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough substantial generic knowledge about integrated care has been developed, better understanding of the factors that drive behaviour, decision-making, collaboration and governance processes in integrated care networks is needed to take integrated care forward. To gain more insight into these topics and to understand integrated care in more depth, a set of underlying values of integrated care has been developed and defined in this study. THEORY AND

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify the underlying values of integrated care. Values theory was used as a theoretical framework for the analysis.

resultsThis study identified 23 values in the current body of knowledge. The most frequently identified values are 'collaborative', 'co-ordinated', 'transparent', 'empowering', 'comprehensive', 'co-produced' and 'shared responsibility and accountability'. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe set of values is presented as a potential basis for a values-driven approach to integrated care. This approach enables better understanding of the behaviours and collaboration in integrated care and may also be used to develop guidance or governance in this area. The practical application of the values and their use at multiple levels is discussed. The consequences of different stakeholder perceptions on the values is explored and an agenda for future research is proposed.

Indexed as

behaviourcollaborationgovernanceintegrated carevalues

Identifiers

PMID30498405
PMCPMC6251066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.