Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498404›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2018

Integration between Primary Health Care and Emergency Services in Brazil: Barriers and Facilitators.

Liza Yurie Teruya Uchimura, Andréa Tenório Correia da Silva, Ana Luiza d'Ávila Viana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liza Yurie Teruya UchimuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-2432
Andréa Tenório Correia da SilvaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, BR.ORCID 0000-0002-3403-5792
Ana Luiza d'Ávila VianaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, BR.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-899X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCharacteristics of primary health care and emergency services may hamper their integration and, therefore, reduce the quality of care and the effectiveness of health systems. This study aims to identify and analyse policy, structural and organizational aspects of healthcare services that may affect the integration between primary health and emergency care networks. THEORY AND

methodsWe conducted a qualitative research study based on grounded theory that included: (1) interviews with 30 health care leaders; and (2) documental analysis of the summaries of Regional Interagency Committee meetings from two regions in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

resultsThe integration between primary health and emergency care network is inefficient. The barriers that contributed to this situation are as follows: (1) policy: the municipal health department is responsible for providing primary health care and the regional health department provides emergency care, but there is a lack of space for the integration of services; (2) structural: distinct criteria for planning mechanisms; and (3) organizational: ineffective point of interaction between different levels of the health system. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Our findings have implications for health management and planning in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) with suggestions for interventions for overcoming the aforementioned barriers.

Indexed as

emergency carehealth policyhealth systemsintegrated careprimary health caresystems integration

Identifiers

PMID30498404
PMCPMC6251068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.