Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498328›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Statistical Measures to Quantify Similarity between Molecular Dynamics Simulation Trajectories.

Jenny Farmer, Fareeha Kanwal, Nikita Nikulsin, Matthew C B Tsilimigras, Donald J Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of Potential Inhibitors of Three NDM Variants ofCurrent computer-aided drug design · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Homology Modeling,Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jenny FarmerDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Fareeha KanwalDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Nikita NikulsinDepartment of Physics and Optical Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Matthew C B TsilimigrasDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Donald J JacobsDepartment of Physics and Optical Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.

Funding

Elucidating beta-lactamase functional mechanisms via evolutionary conservationR15GM101570 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI JACOBS, DONALD · 2013 to 2013
$323k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM101570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulation is commonly employed to explore protein dynamics. Despite the disparate timescales between functional mechanisms and molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories, functional differences are often inferred from differences in conformational ensembles between two proteins in structure-function studies that investigate the effect of mutations. A common measure to quantify differences in dynamics is the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) about the average position of residues defined by C

Indexed as

beta-lactamaseconformational fluctuationsconformational similarity measuresmolecular dynamicsp-valuessite directed mutationsstatistical significance

Identifiers

PMID30498328
PMCPMC6258182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.