Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498237›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Melt-driven erosion in microparticle impact.

Mostafa Hassani-Gangaraj, David Veysset, Keith A Nelson, Christopher A Schuh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microparticle impact-induced bond strength in metals peaks with velocity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decoupling particle-impact dissipation mechanisms in 3D architected materials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Cold Spray: Over 30 Years of Development Toward a Hot Future.Journal of thermal spray technology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mostafa Hassani-GangarajDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-2155
David VeyssetInstitute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-1983
Keith A NelsonInstitute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-5418
Christopher A SchuhDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. schuh@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-2682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impact-induced erosion is the ablation of matter caused by being physically struck by another object. While this phenomenon is known, it is empirically challenging to study mechanistically because of the short timescales and small length scales involved. Here, we resolve supersonic impact erosion in situ with micrometer- and nanosecond-level spatiotemporal resolution. We show, in real time, how metallic microparticles (~10-μm) cross from the regimes of rebound and bonding to the more extreme regime that involves erosion. We find that erosion in normal impact of ductile metallic materials is melt-driven, and establish a mechanistic framework to predict the erosion velocity.

Identifiers

PMID30498237
PMCPMC6265329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.