Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498197›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Glutamatergic and dopaminergic modulation of cortico-striatal circuits probed by dynamic calcium imaging of networks reconstructed in microfluidic chips.

Benjamin Lassus, Jérémie Naudé, Philippe Faure, Denis Guedin, Ysander Von Boxberg, Clotilde Mannoury la Cour, Mark J Millan, Jean-Michel Peyrin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Modeling Neurodegenerative Diseases UsingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Lab-on-Chip Microsystems forFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin LassusCNRS UMR 8256, Biological Adaptation and Ageing, Paris, 75005, France.
Jérémie NaudéCNRS UMR 8246, Neurosciences, Paris, 75005, France.
Philippe FaureCNRS UMR 8246, Neurosciences, Paris, 75005, France.
Denis GuedinServier Biotechnology, Chemogenetic Laboratory @ ICM Brain & Spine Institue, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, 52 boulevard Vincent Auriol, 75013, Paris, France.
Ysander Von BoxbergCNRS UMR 8246, Neurosciences, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-6155
Clotilde Mannoury la CourCentre for Therapeutic Innovation in Neuropsychiatry, Institut de Recherches Servier, Centre de Recherches de Croissy, 78290, Croissy-sur-Seine, France.
Mark J MillanCentre for Therapeutic Innovation in Neuropsychiatry, Institut de Recherches Servier, Centre de Recherches de Croissy, 78290, Croissy-sur-Seine, France.
Jean-Michel PeyrinCNRS UMR 8246, Neurosciences, Paris, 75005, France. jean-michel.peyrin@upmc.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia are functionally interconnected by parallel loops, cellular substrates underlying their interaction remain poorly understood. One novel approach for addressing this issue is microfluidics, a methodology which recapitulates several intrinsic and synaptic properties of cortico-subcortical networks. We developed a microfluidic device where cortical neurons projected onto striatal neurons in a separate compartment. We exploited real-time (low-resolution/high-output) calcium imaging to register network dynamics and characterize the response to glutamatergic and dopaminergic agents. Reconstructed cortico-striatal networks revealed the progressive appearance of cortical VGLUT1 clusters on striatal dendrites, correlating with the emergence of spontaneous and synchronous glutamatergic responses of striatal neurons to concurrent cortical stimulation. Striatal exposure to the NMDA receptor GluN2A subunit antagonist TCN201 did not affect network rhythm, whereas the GluN2B subunit antagonist RO256981 significantly decreased striatal activity. Dopamine application or the D2/D3 receptor agonist, quinpirole, decreased cortico-striatal synchrony whereas the D1 receptor agonist, SKF38393, was ineffective. These data show that cortico-striatal networks reconstructed in a microfluidic environment are synchronized and present characteristics close to those of their in situ counterparts. They should prove instructive for deciphering the molecular substrates of CNS disorders and evaluating the actions of novel therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingNeural PathwaysAnimalsCalciumCalcium SignalingCerebral CortexCorpus StriatumDisease ProgressionDopamineGlutamic AcidIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMicrofluidicsNeuronsReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCalciumDopamineGlutamic AcidNR2B NMDA receptorReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID30498197
PMCPMC6265304
OpenAlexW2900512900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.