Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498163›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Management of cellulitis: current practice and research questions.

Miriam Santer, Anna Lalonde, Nick A Francis, Peter Smart, Julie Hooper, Emma Teasdale, Christopher Del Mar, Joanne R Chalmers, Kim S Thomas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Is compression therapy contraindicated for lower leg erysipelas? : Results of a retrospective analysis].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miriam SanterUniversity of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Anna LalondeUniversity of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Nick A FrancisCardiff University, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Peter SmartFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.
Julie HooperUniversity of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Emma TeasdaleUniversity of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK.
Christopher Del MarFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.
Joanne R ChalmersUniversity of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK.
Kim S ThomasUniversity of Nottingham, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

General PracticeGuideline AdherenceAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsCellulitisDrug Resistance, BacterialHealth Services ResearchHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30498163
PMCPMC6255235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.