Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498049›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Exploring variation in how ambulance services address non-conveyance: a qualitative interview study.

Emma Knowles, Lindsey Bishop-Edwards, Alicia O'Cathain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Alternatives to direct emergency department conveyance of ambulance patients: a scoping review of the evidence.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma KnowlesSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lindsey Bishop-EdwardsSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alicia O'CathainSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/54/75
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is considerable variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England. The aim was to explore variation in how each ambulance service addressed non-conveyance for calls ending in telephone advice and discharge at scene.

designA qualitative interview study.

settingTen large regional ambulance services covering 99% of the population in England.

participantsBetween four and seven interviewees from each ambulance service including managers, paramedics and healthcare commissioners, totalling 49 interviews.

methodsTelephone semistructured interviews.

resultsThe way interviewees in each ambulance service discussed non-conveyance within their organisation varied for three broad themes. First, ambulance service senior management appeared to set the culture around non-conveyance within an organisation, viewing it either as an opportunity or as a risky endeavour. Although motivation levels to undertake non-conveyance did not appear to be directly affected by the stability of an ambulance service in terms of continuity of leadership and externally assessed quality, this stability could affect the ability of the organisation to innovate to increase non-conveyance rates. Second, descriptions of workforce configuration differed between ambulance services, as well as how this workforce was used, trained and valued. Third, interviewees in each ambulance service described health and social care in the wider emergency and urgent care system differently in terms of availability of services that could facilitate non-conveyance, the amount of collaborative working between health and social care services and the ambulance service and complexity related to the numbers of services and healthcare commissioners with whom they had to work.

conclusionsThis study suggests that factors within and outside the control of ambulance services may contribute to variation in non-conveyance rates. These findings can be tested in a quantitative analysis of factors affecting variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicAmbulancesEmergency Medical ServicesEnglandHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationPatient DischargePatient HandoffQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationState MedicineUnnecessary Procedureshealth policyorganisation of health servicesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30498049
PMCPMC6278803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.