Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498039›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Antibiotic use in children with asthma: cohort study in UK and Dutch primary care databases.

Esmé J Baan, Hettie M Janssens, Tine Kerckaert, Patrick J E Bindels, Johan C de Jongste, Miriam C J M Sturkenboom, Katia M C Verhamme

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Impact of COVID-19 on primary care contacts with children and young people in England: longitudinal trends study 2015-2020.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  9. Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. First-Year Antibiotics Exposure in Relation to Childhood Asthma, Allergies, and Airway Illnesses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Esmé J BaanDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hettie M JanssensDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Erasmus University/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tine KerckaertDepartment of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Patrick J E BindelsDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan C de JongsteDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Erasmus University/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Miriam C J M SturkenboomJulius Global Health, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katia M C VerhammeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLGhent University · BEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the rate, indications and type of antibiotic prescriptions in children with and without asthma.

designA retrospective cohort study.

settingTwo population-based primary care databases: Integrated Primary Care Information database (IPCI; the Netherlands) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN; the UK).

participantsChildren aged 5-18 years were included from January 2000 to December 2014. A child was categorised as having asthma if there were ≥2 prescriptions of respiratory drugs in the year following a code for asthma. Children were labelled as non-asthmatic if no asthma code was recorded in the patient file.

main outcome measuresRate of antibiotic prescriptions, related indications and type of antibiotic drugs.

resultsThe cohorts in IPCI and THIN consisted of 946 143 and 7 241 271 person years (PY), respectively. In both cohorts, antibiotic use was significantly higher in asthmatic children (IPCI: 197vs126 users/1000 PY, THIN: 374vs250 users/1000 PY). In children with asthma, part of antibiotic prescriptions were for an asthma exacerbation only (IPCI: 14%, THIN: 4%) and prescriptions were more often due to lower respiratory tract infections then in non-asthmatic children (IPCI: 18%vs13%, THIN: 21%vs12%). Drug type and quality indicators depended more on age, gender and database than on asthma status.

conclusionsUse of antibiotics was higher in asthmatic children compared with non-asthmatic children. This was mostly due to diseases for which antibiotics are normally not indicated according to guidelines. Further awareness among physicians and patients is needed to minimise antibiotic overuse and limit antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareAdolescentAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAsthmaBacterial InfectionsCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansMaleAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAnti-Bacterial Agentsasthmaepidemiologyinfectious diseasespaediatricsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID30498039
PMCPMC6278808
OpenAlexW2903032330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.