Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30498017›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Automated ASPECTS on Noncontrast CT Scans in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine Learning.

H Kuang, M Najm, D Chakraborty, N Maraj, S I Sohn, M Goyal, M D Hill, A M Demchuk, B K Menon, W Qiu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Application of radiomics in ischemic stroke.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

H KuangFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-7341-9871
M NajmFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-3074-4791
D ChakrabortyFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-1867-6116
N MarajFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-5846-7637
S I SohnDepartment of Neurology (S.I.S.), Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-1242
M GoyalFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0001-9060-2109
M D HillFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-6269-1543
A M DemchukFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-4930-7789
B K MenonFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-3466-496X
W QiuFrom the Calgary Stroke Program (H.K., W.Q., M.N., D.C., N.M., M.G., M.D.H., A.M.D., B.K.M.) qiu.wu.ch@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7827-8270
MACOM (United States) · USMahindra and Mahindra Limited (India) · INKeimyung University · KR

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was devised as a systematic method to assess the extent of early ischemic change on noncontrast CT (NCCT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our aim was to automate ASPECTS to objectively score NCCT of AIS patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected NCCT images with a 5-mm thickness of 257 patients with acute ischemic stroke (<8 hours from onset to scans) followed by a diffusion-weighted imaging acquisition within 1 hour. Expert ASPECTS readings on DWI were used as ground truth. Texture features were extracted from each ASPECTS region of the 157 training patient images to train a random forest classifier. The unseen 100 testing patient images were used to evaluate the performance of the trained classifier. Statistical analyses on the total ASPECTS and region-level ASPECTS were conducted.

resultsFor the total ASPECTS of the unseen 100 patients, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the automated ASPECTS method and DWI ASPECTS scores of expert readings was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.83) and the mean ASPECTS difference in the Bland-Altman plot was 0.3 (limits of agreement, -3.3, 2.6). Individual ASPECTS region-level analysis showed that our method yielded κ = 0.60, sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 91.8%, and area under curve of 0.79 for 100 × 10 ASPECTS regions. Additionally, when ASPECTS was dichotomized (>4 and ≤4), κ = 0.78, sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 80%, and area under the curve of 0.89 were generated between the proposed method and expert readings on DWI.

conclusionsThe proposed automated ASPECTS scoring approach shows reasonable ability to determine ASPECTS on NCCT images in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlbertaBrain IschemiaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30498017
PMCPMC7048586
OpenAlexW2902345415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.