Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30497991›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

Novel Approach to Cluster Patient-Generated Data Into Actionable Topics: Case Study of a Web-Based Breast Cancer Forum.

Josette Jones, Meeta Pradhan, Masoud Hosseini, Anand Kulanthaivel, Mahmood Hosseini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josette JonesHealth Informatics, BioHealth Informatics Department, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4996-8595
Meeta Pradhan *Indiana Biosciences Research Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-1897
Masoud HosseiniHealth Informatics, BioHealth Informatics Department, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-9092
Anand Kulanthaivel *Health Informatics, BioHealth Informatics Department, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-7613
Mahmood HosseiniPurdue School of Science and Technology, Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6924-2978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing use of social media and mHealth apps has generated new opportunities for health care consumers to share information about their health and well-being. Information shared through social media contains not only medical information but also valuable information about how the survivors manage disease and recovery in the context of daily life.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of acquiring and modeling the topics of a major online breast cancer support forum. Breast cancer patient support forums were selected to discover the hidden, less obvious aspects of disease management and recovery.

methodsFirst, manual topic categorization was performed using qualitative content analysis (QCA) of each individual forum board. Second, we requested permission from the Breastcancer.org Community for a more in-depth analysis of the postings. Topic modeling was then performed using open source software Machine Learning Language Toolkit, followed by multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis to detect highly correlated topics among the different website forums.

resultsQCA of the forums resulted in 20 categories of user discussion. The final topic model organized >4 million postings into 30 manageable topics. Using qualitative analysis of the topic models and statistical analysis, we grouped these 30 topics into 4 distinct clusters with similarity scores of ≥0.80; these clusters were labeled Symptoms & Diagnosis, Treatment, Financial, and Family & Friends. A clinician review confirmed the clinical significance of the topic clusters, allowing for future detection of actionable items within social media postings. To identify the most significant topics across individual forums, MLR demonstrated that 6 topics-based on the Akaike information criterion values ranging from -642.75 to -412.32-were statistically significant.

conclusionsThe developed method provides an insight into the areas of interest and concern, including those not ascertainable in the clinic. Such topics included support from lay and professional caregivers and late side effects of therapy that consumers discuss in social media and may be of interest to clinicians. The developed methods and results indicate the potential of social media to inform the clinical workflow with regards to the impact of recovery on daily life.

Indexed as

data interpretationinfodemiologynatural language processingpatient-generated informationsocial mediastatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID30497991
PMCPMC6293240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.