Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30497526›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

The effectiveness of interventions to reduce peripheral blood culture contamination in acute care: a systematic review protocol.

J A Hughes, C J Cabilan, Julian Williams, Mercedes Ray, Fiona Coyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Timing of Blood Cultures in the Setting of Febrile Neutropenia: An Australian Institutional ExperienceTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J A HughesSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. James.Hughes@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-2489
C J CabilanClinical Research Officer, Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Australia.
Julian WilliamsEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Ground Floor, Dr James Mayne Building, Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, 4029, Australia.
Mercedes RayEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Ground Floor, Dr James Mayne Building, Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, 4029, Australia.
Fiona CoyerSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

Emergency Medicine Foundation EMCB-402R23-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood cultures are an integral part of the diagnosis of bacteremia in unwell patients. The treatment of bacteremia involves the rapid and accurate identification of the causative agent grown from the blood cultures collected. Contamination of blood cultures with non-pathogenic microbes such as skin commensals causes false positive results and subsequent unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. While guidelines for blood culture quality recommend no more than 2-3% contamination rate, rates up to 12% are reported in the literature. There have been a number of methods proposed to reduce the contamination of blood cultures, including educational interventions, changing of skin cleansing preparations and introduction of blood culture collection packs in acute care settings. This protocol outlines methods to identify and evaluate interventions to reduce blood culture contamination in the acute care setting.

methodsThe reviewers will conduct a systematic search of literature in CINHAL, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central register of controlled trials. Unpublished works will be identified in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Articles will be assessed for relevance based on their title and abstract. Remaining relevant citations will have their full text retrieved and assessed against eligibility criteria. All studies that meet the eligibility criteria will have their methodological quality appraised. Assessments for relevance and methodological quality will be conducted independently by two reviewers. If appropriate, data will be analysed using the Mantel-Haenszel method under a random effects model. Heterogeneity of the studies will be assessed using the I DISCUSSION: This review will identify and summarise the interventions previously described in the literature aimed at reducing peripherally collected blood culture contamination rates in acute care. These findings have the potential to lead to multifaceted interventions based on previous evidence to reduce blood culture contamination in the acute setting. Reductions in the proportion of contaminated blood cultures have the potential to save money, unrequired treatment (particularly antimicrobials) and hospital bed days. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: In accordance with guidelines outlined in the PRISMA-P methodology, this protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on December 8, 2017, and last updated on January 4, 2018 (registration number CRD42017081650).

Indexed as

Critical CareBacteremiaBlood CultureBlood Specimen CollectionEvidence-Based PracticeHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicAcute careBlood cultureContaminationMicrobial contaminationPeripheral blood collectionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30497526
PMCPMC6267024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.