Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30497387›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Compared efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in treating acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Dong Wang, Xiao-Hong Yang, Ji-Dong Zhang, Rui-Bin Li, Min Jia, Xiao-Ran Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dong WangDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China.
Xiao-Hong YangDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China. 13933058601@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7150-4570
Ji-Dong ZhangDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China.
Rui-Bin LiDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China.
Min JiaDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China.
Xiao-Ran CuiDepartment of Sixth Cardiovascular Medicine, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 309 North Zhonghua Street, Shijiazhuang, 05400, Hebei, China.
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsTicagrelor has been acknowledged as a new oral antagonist of P2Y12-adenosine diphosphate receptor, as a strategy with more rapid onset as well as more significant platelet inhibition function in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel remains controversial. The current meta-analysis was conducted to better evaluate the role of ticagrelor in comparison of clopidogrel in treating ACS patients.

methodsThe publications involving the safety as well as the efficacy of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor were screened and identified updated to June 2018. After rigorous review, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were extracted and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted. To analyze the summary odds ratios (ORs) of the endpoints of interest, we applied Meta-analysis Revman 5.3 software.

resultsThere were a total of 10 studies that met our inclusion criteria, of which the risk of bleeding rate (P = 0.43), MI (P = 0.14), and stroke (P = 0.70) had no association with significant differences between patients receiving ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Nonetheless, higher rate of dyspnea was observed in ticagrelor group (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.70-2.05, P<0.00001 = .

conclusionsOur present findings suggest similar efficacy and safety profiles for clopidogrel and ticagrelor Ticagrelor should be considered as a valuable option to reduce the risk of bleeding, MI and stroke, whereas potentially increases the incidence of dyspnea. Given the metabolic process, ticagrelor may be a valid and even more potent antiplatelet drug than clopidogrel, as an alternative strategy in treating patients with clopidogrel intolerance or resistance.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeClopidogrelDyspneaHemorrhageHumansPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTicagrelorTreatment OutcomeClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsTicagrelorAcute coronary syndromeClopidogrelMeta-analysisTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID30497387
PMCPMC6267904
OpenAlexW2902542931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.