Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30497367›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Multilevel comparative bioinformatics to investigate evolutionary relationships and specificities in gene annotations: an example for tomato and grapevine.

Luca Ambrosino, Valentino Ruggieri, Hamed Bostan, Marco Miralto, Nicola Vitulo, Mohamed Zouine, Amalia Barone, Mondher Bouzayen, Luigi Frusciante, Mario Pezzotti and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The AscidiaFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. mInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca AmbrosinoDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Valentino RuggieriDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Hamed BostanDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Marco MiraltoDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Nicola VituloDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mohamed ZouineGénomique et Biotechnologie des Fruits, UMR990 INRA / INP-Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Amalia BaroneDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Mondher BouzayenGénomique et Biotechnologie des Fruits, UMR990 INRA / INP-Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Luigi FruscianteDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy.
Mario PezzottiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giorgio ValleCRIBI Biotechnology Centre, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Maria Luisa ChiusanoDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples "Federico II,", Portici, Naples, Italy. chiusano@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Omics" approaches may provide useful information for a deeper understanding of speciation events, diversification and function innovation. This can be achieved by investigating the molecular similarities at sequence level between species, allowing the definition of ortholog and paralog genes. However, the spreading of sequenced genome, often endowed with still preliminary annotations, requires suitable bioinformatics to be appropriately exploited in this framework.

resultsWe presented here a multilevel comparative approach to investigate on genome evolutionary relationships and peculiarities of two fleshy fruit species of relevant agronomic interest, Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Vitis vinifera (grapevine). We defined 17,823 orthology relationships between tomato and grapevine reference gene annotations. The resulting orthologs are associated with the detected paralogs in each species, permitting the definition of gene networks, useful to investigate the different relationships. The reconciliation of the compared collections in terms of an updating of the functional descriptions was also exploited. All the results were made accessible in ComParaLogs, a dedicated bioinformatics platform available at http://biosrv.cab.unina.it/comparalogs/gene/search .

conclusionsThe aim of the work was to suggest a reliable approach to detect all similarities of gene loci between two species based on the integration of results from different levels of information, such as the gene, the transcript and the protein sequences, overcoming possible limits due to exclusive protein versus protein comparisons. This to define reliable ortholog and paralog genes, as well as species specific gene loci in the two species, overcoming limits due to the possible draft nature of preliminary gene annotations. Moreover, reconciled functional descriptions, as well as common or peculiar enzymatic classes and protein domains from tomato and grapevine, together with the definition of species-specific gene sets after the pairwise comparisons, contributed a comprehensive set of information useful to comparatively exploit the two species gene annotations and investigate on differences between species with climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. In addition, the definition of networks of ortholog genes and of associated paralogs, and the organization of web-based interfaces for the exploration of the results, defined a friendly computational bench-work in support of comparative analyses between two species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultilevel AnalysisComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, PlantPhylogenyRNA, MessengerSolanum lycopersicumTranscription FactorsVitisRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsComparative genomicsGrapevineOrthologsParalogsSpecies specific gene lociTomato

Identifiers

PMID30497367
PMCPMC6266932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.