Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496880›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Organs at Risk Considerations for Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: What Is Safe for Lung Parenchyma?

Feng-Ming Spring Kong, Vitali Moiseenko, Jing Zhao, Michael T Milano, Ling Li, Andreas Rimner, Shiva Das, X Allen Li, Moyed Miften, ZhongXing Liao and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Primary Results of NRG-RTOG1106/ECOG-ACRIN 6697: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Individualized Adaptive (chemo)Radiotherapy Using MidtreatmentJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. VPrecision radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Patient selection, ventricular tachycardia substrate delineation, and data transfer for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng-Ming Spring KongUniversity Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: fxk132@case.edu.
Vitali MoiseenkoUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jing ZhaoTongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Michael T MilanoUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Ling LiFudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Andreas RimnerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Shiva DasLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
X Allen LiMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Moyed MiftenUniversity of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado.
ZhongXing LiaoMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mary MartelMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Soren M BentzenUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Andrew JacksonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jimm GrimmDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lawrence B MarksLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ellen YorkeMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNJohns Hopkins University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Atlases to Report and Correlate Radiotherapy Dose Distributions with OutcomesR01CA129182 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, ANDREW · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and is often used for recurrent lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT), including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is a major concern for which it is important to understand dosimetric and clinical predictors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was undertaken through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Working Group on Biological Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Data from studies of lung SBRT published through the summer of 2016 that provided detailed information about RILT were analyzed.

resultsNinety-seven studies were ultimately considered. Definitions of the risk organ and complication endpoints as well as dose-volume information presented varied among studies. The risk of RILT, including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, was reported to be associated with the size and location of the tumor. Patients with interstitial lung disease appear to be especially susceptible to severe RILT. A variety of dosimetric parameters were reported to be associated with RILT. There was no apparent threshold "tolerance dose-volume" level. However, most studies noted safe treatment with a rate of symptomatic RILT of <10% to 15% after lung SBRT with a mean lung dose (MLD) of the combined lungs ≤8 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions and the percent of total lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V

conclusionsTo allow more rigorous analysis of this complication, future studies should standardize reporting by including standardized endpoint and volume definitions and providing dose-volume information for all patients, with and without RILT.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLungLung NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalOrgans at RiskPulmonary FibrosisRadiation PneumonitisRadiation ToleranceRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRe-IrradiationRisk FactorsTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID30496880
PMCPMC9454379
OpenAlexW2902306407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.