Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496580›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019

Screening for Developmental Neurotoxicity at the National Toxicology Program: The Future Is Here.

Mamta Behl, Kristen Ryan, Jui-Hua Hsieh, Frederick Parham, Andrew J Shapiro, Bradley J Collins, Nisha S Sipes, Linda S Birnbaum, John R Bucher, Paul M D Foster and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Statistical analysis of multi-endpoint phenotypic screening increases sensitivity of planarian neurotoxicity testing.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Enabling novel paradigms: a biological questions-based approach to human chemical hazard and drug safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Organoid intelligence for developmental neurotoxicity testing.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mamta BehlDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Kristen RyanDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Jui-Hua HsiehKelly Government Solutions, Durham, North Carolina 27709.
Frederick ParhamDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Andrew J ShapiroDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Bradley J CollinsDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Nisha S SipesDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Linda S BirnbaumDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
John R BucherDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Paul M D FosterDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Nigel J WalkerDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Richard S PaulesDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.
Raymond R TiceRTice Consulting, Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Toxicological Assessments for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103316 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALKER, NIGEL J · 2016 to 2019
$31.9M
Biomolecular Screening and Alternative Approaches for the National Toxicology ProgramZIAES103318 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASEY, WARREN · 2016 to 2021
$25.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) receives requests to evaluate chemicals with potential to cause adverse health effects, including developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). Some recent requests have included classes of chemicals such as flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic compounds, perfluoroalkyl substances, and bisphenol A analogs with approximately 20-50 compounds per class, many of which include commercial mixtures. However, all the compounds within a class cannot be tested using traditional DNT animal testing guideline studies due to resource and time limitations. Hence, a rapid and biologically relevant screening approach is required to prioritize compounds for further in vivo testing. Because neurodevelopment is a complex process involving multiple distinct cellular processes, one assay will unlikely address the complexity. Hence, the NTP sought to characterize a battery of in vitro and alternative animal assays to quantify chemical effects on a variety of neurodevelopmental processes. A culmination of this effort resulted in a NTP-hosted collaborative project with approximately 40 participants spanning across domains of academia, industry, government, and regulatory agencies; collaborators presented data on cell-based assays and alternative animal models that was generated using a targeted set of compounds provided by the NTP. The NTP analyzed the assay results using benchmark concentration (BMC) modeling to be able to compare results across the divergent assays. The results were shared with the contributing researchers on a private web application during the workshop, and are now publicly available. This article highlights the overview and goals of the project, and describes the NTP's approach in creating the chemical library, development of NTPs data analysis strategy, and the structure of the web application. Finally, we discuss key issues with emphasis on the utility of this approach, and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed for its use in regulatory decision making.

Indexed as

Government ProgramsToxicologyAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesEnvironmental PollutantsGuidelines as TopicNeurotoxicity SyndromesProgram DevelopmentSmall Molecule LibrariesToxicity TestsUnited StatesEnvironmental PollutantsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID30496580
PMCPMC6657567
OpenAlexW2902929934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.