Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496532›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Examining the external validity of the CRUZA study, a randomized trial to promote implementation of evidence-based cancer control programs by faith-based organizations.

Jennifer Dacey Allen, Rachel C Shelton, Lindsay Kephart, Laura S Tom, Bryan Leyva, Hosffman Ospino, Adolfo G Cuevas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01740219 (Promoting the Utilization of Cancer Early Detection Methods Among Latinos in Church), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01740219 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting the Utilization of Cancer Early Detection Methods Among Latinos in Church: a Faith-based Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2011 to 2013Enrolled348ConditionsCancerArmsCapacity Enhancement, Standard Dissemination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer Dacey AllenCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Rachel C SheltonCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Lindsay KephartCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Laura S TomCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Bryan LeyvaCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Hosffman OspinoCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Adolfo G CuevasCommunity Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA.

Funding

U Mass Boston / DFHCC U54 Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA156732 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Nikhil Wagle · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
HARVARD PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER ON NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY-CATEGORY 1U48DP001946 · DP · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI GORTMAKER, STEVEN L · 2009 to 2013
$7.5M
CTSA Institutional Mentored Career Development Program (KL2)KL2TR002545 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI FREUND, KAREN · 2018 to 2022
$5.0M
Understanding the dissemination of evidence-based interventions through churchesR21MD005976 · NIMHD · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ALLEN, JENNIFER DACEY · 2010 to 2011
$479k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001946NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156732NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD005976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRUZA trial tested the efficacy of an organizational-level intervention to increase capacity among Catholic parishes to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for cancer control. This paper examines the external generalizability of the CRUZA study findings by comparing characteristics of parishes that agreed to participate in the intervention trial versus those that declined participation. Sixty-five Roman Catholic parishes that offered Spanish-language mass in Massachusetts were invited to complete a four-part survey assessing organization-level characteristics that, based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), may be associated with EBI implementation. Forty-nine parishes (75%) completed the survey and were invited to participate in the CRUZA trial, which randomized parishes to either a "capacity enhancement intervention" or a "standard dissemination" group. Of these 49 parishes, 31 (63%) agreed to participate in the trial, whereas 18 parishes (37%) declined participation. Parishes that participated in the CRUZA intervention trial were similar to those that did not participate with respect to "inner organizational setting" characteristics of the CFIR, including innovation and values fit, implementation climate, and organizational culture. Change commitment, a submeasure of organizational readiness that reflects the shared resolve of organizational members to implement an innovation, was significantly higher among the participating parishes (mean = 3.93, SD = 1.08) as compared to nonparticipating parishes (mean = 3.27, SD = 1.08) (Z = -2.16, p = .03). Parishes that agreed to participate in the CRUZA intervention trial were similar to those that declined participation with regard to organizational characteristics that may predict implementation of EBIs. Pragmatic tools to assess external generalizability in community-based implementation trials and to promote readiness among faith-based organizations to implement EBIs are needed to enhance the reach and impact of public health research. Clinical Trial information: The CRUZA trial identifier number with clinicaltrials.gov is NCT01740219.

Indexed as

Faith-Based OrganizationsNeoplasmsCatholicismDelivery of Health CareHumansOrganizational CultureCancer screeningEvidence-based interventionsExternal generalizabilityFaith-based organizationsImplementation scienceLatinos

Identifiers

PMID30496532
PMCPMC7529011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.