Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30496448›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2018

Long-Term Survivorship Care After Cancer Treatment - Summary of a 2017 National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop.

Ronald M Kline, Neeraj K Arora, Cathy J Bradley, Eden R Brauer, Darci L Graves, Natasha Buchanan Lunsford, Mary S McCabe, Shelley Fuld Nasso, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Julia H Rowland and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Feasibility of delivering survivorship care via lay health educators: A pilot randomized controlled trial among rural cancer survivors.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Exploring the barriers to optimal survivorship care for people living with Cancer in NSW.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Health behaviors among young adult cancer survivors and the importance of task self-efficacy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Voices of Black men: reflecting on prostate cancer survivorship care plans.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald M KlineCenter for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Neeraj K AroraHealthcare Delivery and Disparities Research Program, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Cathy J BradleyDepartment of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.
Eden R BrauerJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Darci L GravesOffice of Minority Health, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Natasha Buchanan LunsfordDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Mary S McCabeIndependent Consultant in Survivorship and Medical Ethics, Arlington, VA.
Shelley Fuld NassoNational Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Silver Spring, MD.
Larissa NekhlyudovDepartment of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Julia H RowlandOffice of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Rebekkah M SchearLIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes at Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Patricia A GanzJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · USColorado School of Public Health · USLivestrong Foundation · USOffice of Minority Health · USPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine sponsored a workshop on July 24 and 25, 2017 on Long-Term Survivorship after Cancer Treatment. The workshop brought together diverse stakeholders (patients, advocates, academicians, clinicians, research funders, and policymakers) to review progress and ongoing challenges since the Institute of Medicine (IOM)'s seminal report on the subject of adult cancer survivors published in 2006. This commentary profiles the content of the meeting sessions and concludes with recommendations that stem from the workshop discussions. Although there has been progress over the past decade, many of the recommendations from the 2006 report have not been fully implemented. Obstacles related to the routine delivery of standardized physical and psychosocial care services to cancer survivors are substantial, with important gaps in care for patients and caregivers. Innovative care models for cancer survivors have emerged, and changes in accreditation requirements such as the Commission on Cancer's (CoC) requirement for survivorship care planning have put cancer survivorship on the radar. The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation's Oncology Care Model (OCM), which requires psychosocial services and the creation of survivorship care plans for its beneficiary participants, has placed increased emphasis on this service. The OCM, in conjunction with the CoC requirement, is encouraging electronic health record vendors to incorporate survivorship care planning functionality into updated versions of their products. As new models of care emerge, coordination and communication among survivors and their clinicians will be required to implement patient- and community-centered strategies.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsSurvivorshipHumansMental HealthNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID30496448
PMCPMC6658871
OpenAlexW2902924013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.