ReviewJournal of molecular cell biology2019
Mutant p53 in colon cancer.
Review in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
168 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 300 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Racial disparities in colorectal cancer clinicopathological and molecular tumor characteristics: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Pooled it
- The histological and molecular characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Meteorin Is a Novel Interaction Partner of p60-Katanin During Mitosis in HCT-116 Colorectal Cancer Cells.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Overcoming Resistance: Targeting Survivin-Driven Apoptotic Resistance Restores Irinotecan Sensitivity inCancers · 2026Article
- Identifying phenotype-genotype-function coupling in 3D organoid imaging using Shape, Appearance and Motion Phenotype Observation Tool (SPOT).Nature communications · 2026Article
- TP53 mutation is associated with improved disease control in patients with advanced RAS wild-type colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with cetuximab and pembrolizumab.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- TP53 Loss Fuels mTORC1 Activation and Autophagy Suppression to Drive Immune-Cold Colorectal Cancer.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting mutant p53 in cancer: from mechanistic insights to therapeutic strategies.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2026Review
- Interplay Between p53 and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Associations with Mismatch Repair Status, Tumor Microenvironment, and Clinicopathological Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Colorectal Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- CF10 Displays Improved Synergy with Oxaliplatin inCancers · 2026Article
- Exploratory Proteomic Profiling Reveals Potential Mediators of 5-FU Response under p53 Deficiency in Colon Cancer Cells.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Comparative spatial whole transcriptome analysis of matched frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissues.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Zooming into Disease at the Nanoscale: High-Speed Atomic Force Microscopy in Biomedical Discovery.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- P53 Inhibition Diminishes IGSF9 Gene Activity to Promote DNA Repair and Exacerbate the Progression of Colon Cancer.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- The intricate interplay of microbial metabolomics and carcinogenesis: a spotlight on mechanistic pathways, clinical implications and methodological challenges.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- IL6/STAT3 induced GRWD1 mediates aerobic glycolysis via P53/GLUT1 signal axis in colon carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accumulation of genetic alterations in driver genes is responsible for the development and malignant progression of colorectal cancer. Comprehensive genome analyses have revealed the driver genes, including APC, KRAS, TGFBR2, and TP53, whose mutations are frequently found in human colorectal cancers. Among them, the p53 mutation is found in ~60% of colorectal cancers, and a majority of mutations are missense-type at 'hot spots', suggesting an oncogenic role of mutant p53 by 'gain-of-function' mechanisms. Mouse model studies have shown that one of these missense-type mutations, p53 R270H (corresponding to human R273H), causes submucosal invasion of intestinal tumors, while the loss of wild-type p53 has a limited effect on the invasion process. Furthermore, the same mutant p53 promotes metastasis when combined with Kras activation and TGF-β suppression. Importantly, either missense-type p53 mutation or loss of wild-type p53 induces NF-κB activation by a variety of mechanisms, such as increasing promoter accessibility by chromatin remodeling, which may contribute to progression to epithelial-mesenchymal transition. These results indicate that missense-type p53 mutations together with loss of wild-type p53 accelerate the late stage of colorectal cancer progression through the activation of both oncogenic and inflammatory pathways. Accordingly, the suppression of the mutant p53 function via the inhibition of nuclear accumulation is expected to be an effective strategy against malignant progression of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.